Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
BUG=406600, 406895
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/497733005
|
|
(patchset #1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/493163003/)
Reason for revert:
Needs to address comments before landing
Original issue's description:
> Use number of components from ICC profile and alternate color space
>
> BUG=406806
>
> Committed: https://pdfium.googlesource.com/pdfium/+/be83103
TBR=tsepez@chromium.org,jun_fang@foxitsoftware.com
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=406806
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/504883003
|
|
BUG=406806
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/493163003
|
|
BUG=387983
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/454283002
|
|
Pdfium reads the page number from the field of '/Count' but it can't
load the number assigned by this field due to the damaged data. Add a
check to ensure that the required page should be one of loaded pages.
BUG=406090
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/477873003
|
|
From PDF reference 8.6.5.5, this could only be 1, 3 or 4.
BUG=387968
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/464083003
|
|
BUG=405588
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/496883002
|
|
m_pageObjects never gets initialize, thus making CPDF_PageContentGenerate::GenerateContent() doing nothing.
Since the CPFD_PageObject are owned by m_pPage, no need to release them in the destructor.
BUG=385119
R=thestig@chromium.org, vitalybuka@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/470253004
|
|
BUG=400996
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/477323002
|
|
space in CPDF_ColorSpace::Load
The test file defines a wrong color space object (7 0 obj). In the content of 7 0 obj,
the reserved obj (0 0 R) is used. The process of loading color space returns NULL when
the reserved obj (0 0 R) is found. For the error color space, it only needs to return
NULL when an error is detected.
BUG=403032
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/477413002
|
|
m_pBaseCS will be released in CPDF_DocPageData::Clear.
BUG=401372
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/472653002
|
|
Should there be cases where this fails to compile, it indicates a mistake,
either an incorrectly declared overrriden virtual method, or a method that
should be declared non-virtual.
The only issues were with CPDF_CustomAccess::GetBlock(), CPDF_CustomAccess::GetByte(),
and CPDF_CustomAccess::GetFullPath(). These don't appear to be used anywhere,
and are removed. Two members are removed that are no longer needed once those
methods are removed.
R=jam@chromium.org, jun_fang@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/454983003
|
|
This has no ill-effect at present, but may be distracting when viewing the file
since it just looks wrong.
R=jun_fang@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/461933003
|
|
with the old pattern
This patch is related to https://pdfium.googlesource.com/pdfium/+/1b9c5c4dc41956b8c5ab17b9a882adf8a2513768
BUG=402260
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/460383004
|
|
BUG=387774
R=palmer@chromium.org, tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/441503003
|
|
Patterns are managed in CPDF_DocPageData. When
a document is closed, all patterns will be
released in the deconstruction of CPDF_DocPageData.
However, some patterns which are referenced in
CPDF_Color can't get the notification from the
destroy of CPDF_DocPageData. It will cause
use-after-free in CPDF_Color::~CPDF_Color.
BUG=392719
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/439693002
|
|
of i++
BUG=387979
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/439733002
|
|
BUG=382988
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/430733004
|
|
R=jun_fang@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/417263008
|
|
BUG=387854
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/372453005
|
|
No intended behavior change.
BUG=pdfium:29
R=bo_xu@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/426763003
|
|
BUG=391929
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/419693003
|
|
BUG=None
R=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/420793004
|
|
No intended behavior change.
- Remove more unused variables, functions, member variables.
- Put a few constructor initializers in the order they execute in.
- Add braces for subobject initializers.
- Fix a handful of signed / unsigned comparisons.
BUG=pdfium:29
R=bo_xu@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/429593005
|
|
Found by clang's -Wunused-variable, -Wunused-function, -Wunused-const-variable.
BUG=none
R=bo_xu@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/404653005
|
|
BUG=pdfium:19
R=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/403163002
|
|
BUG=382667
R=palmer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/322333002
|
|
BUG=382667
R=jschuh@chromium.org, jun_fang@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/390983007
|
|
Calling `delete` on an object of a type that has virtual functions but
not a virtual destructor is questionable: Since the object has virtual functions,
it likely has subclasses, so if it's deleted through the base pointer and the
destructor isn't virtual, the subclass destructor won't be called.
In most cases, the classes getting deleted can just be marked final to tell
the compiler that it can't possibly have subclasses (this also enables the
compiler to generate better code).
Two classes didn't have any sub- or superclasses but virtual functions -
this doesn't make sense, so make all methods of these classes non-virtual.
(Also delete an unused function on one of the two classes.)
In one case, a class actually did have a subclass that needs to be deleted
virtually, so mark one destructor as virtual.
BUG=none
R=bo_xu@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/370853002
|
|
BUG=260112, 249006, 275281, 354966, 365302, 236952
R=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/400083002
|
|
Original patch by Andrey Khalyavin <halyavin@google.com>
BUG=N/A
R=bo_xu@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/384143002
|
|
BUG=386728
R=palmer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/397803002
|
|
BUG=391470
R=palmer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/384593002
|
|
BUG=387809
R=palmer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/379283003
|
|
BUG=386730
R=palmer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/379923012
|
|
BUG=387011
R=palmer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/382603003
|
|
BUG=387835
R=palmer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/381173002
|
|
BUG=387834
R=palmer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/386663003
|
|
BUG=387975
R=thakis@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/379273002
|
|
BUG=
R=palmer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/372473003
|
|
BUG=387822
R=jun_fang@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/367383002
|
|
BUG=382820
R=palmer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/349853003
|
|
BUG=382242
R=palmer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/341333004
|
|
BUG=387785
R=palmer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/362403002
|
|
BUG=387783
R=palmer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/368783004
|
|
BUG=386729
R=palmer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/366803003
|
|
BUG=387841
R=palmer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/354363003
|
|
BUG=387506
R=palmer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/361103002
|
|
BUG=
R=thakis@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/361553002
|
|
R=palmer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/331123002
|