Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Here, testing/gtest and testing/some-pdfium-stuff will be different
directories, since we will use the gtest at top-level. For standalone,
they happen to be the same.
TBR=bo_xu@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/852493002
|
|
Original at URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/810883005
Note that the new code in XFA introduces many more of these, to be handled
separately.
TBR=brucedawson@chromium.org
TBR=thestig@chromium.org
BUG=https://code.google.com/p/pdfium/issues/detail?id=102
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/842223004
|
|
Original CL at https://codereview.chromium.org/808553013
TBR=brucedawson@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/837253002
|
|
Original CL at https://codereview.chromium.org/837843002
TBR=brucedawson@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/809313008
|
|
Get rid of FX_LPCSTR cast.
Follow up on https://codereview.chromium.org/733693003
R=brucedawson@chromium.org, tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/809993004
|
|
Original CL at https://codereview.chromium.org/831653002/
TBR=palmer@chromium.org, brucedawson@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/830553002
|
|
Getting rid of more (FX_LPCWSTR) casts and fixing two bugs revealed by this.
Since casts to FX_LPCWSTR have been shown to hide bugs I tried removing
more of them, targeting those places where a cast was used to force a
conversion from CFX_WideString to FX_LPCWSTR, replacing these casts with
calls to the newly added .c_str() function. This revealed two places
where the cast was hiding a bug -- where ->c_str() was required instead!
This removes ~33 FX_LPCWSTR casts and there are ~31 left, many of which
will go away in some future change.
Also includes this change:
Removing unnecessary casts from wchar_t* to wchar_t*, by various names.
Original patch from Bruce Dawson(brucedawson@chromium.org)
TBR=bo_xu@foxitsoftware.com, tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/811593007
|
|
Zero initialize ch to avoid possible bug - conditions are very subtle.
Whether ch and iRet are read without being initialized depends on complex
preconditions and cannot be determined by looking at these function.
Therefore it seems prudent to zero initialize them to avoid any risk.
BUG=427616
TBR=bo_xu@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/727083002
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/793763005
|
|
|
|
BUG=https://code.google.com/p/pdfium/issues/detail?id=78
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/726143002
|
|
|
|
BUG=408532
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/524443002
|
|
Should there be cases where this fails to compile, it indicates a mistake,
either an incorrectly declared overrriden virtual method, or a method that
should be declared non-virtual.
The only issues were with CPDF_CustomAccess::GetBlock(), CPDF_CustomAccess::GetByte(),
and CPDF_CustomAccess::GetFullPath(). These don't appear to be used anywhere,
and are removed. Two members are removed that are no longer needed once those
methods are removed.
R=jam@chromium.org, jun_fang@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/454983003
|
|
BUG=400662
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/445303002
|
|
R=jun_fang@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/417263008
|
|
fpdfview.cpp
BUG=397258
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/419063002
|
|
Found by clang's -Wunused-variable, -Wunused-function, -Wunused-const-variable.
BUG=none
R=bo_xu@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/404653005
|
|
BUG=pdfium:19
R=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/403163002
|
|
BUG=382667
R=palmer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/322333002
|
|
The |nGrowBy| argument to |SetSize| was always -1, which caused the
effective m_nGrowBy value to always be its default value: 0. So it was not
needed, and was cluttering up the logic.
BUG=384662
Check for integer overflow in CFX_BasicArray.
BUG=384662
R=bo_xu@foxitsoftware.com, rsesek@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/415803002
|
|
BUG=384662
R=bo_xu@foxitsoftware.com, rsesek@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/411033003
|
|
Calling `delete` on an object of a type that has virtual functions but
not a virtual destructor is questionable: Since the object has virtual functions,
it likely has subclasses, so if it's deleted through the base pointer and the
destructor isn't virtual, the subclass destructor won't be called.
In most cases, the classes getting deleted can just be marked final to tell
the compiler that it can't possibly have subclasses (this also enables the
compiler to generate better code).
Two classes didn't have any sub- or superclasses but virtual functions -
this doesn't make sense, so make all methods of these classes non-virtual.
(Also delete an unused function on one of the two classes.)
In one case, a class actually did have a subclass that needs to be deleted
virtually, so mark one destructor as virtual.
BUG=none
R=bo_xu@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/370853002
|
|
BUG=381521
R=palmer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/383563002
|
|
BUG=
R=palmer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/372473003
|
|
BUG=382601
R=jun_fang@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/336003004
|
|
BUG=382656
R=palmer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/334573007
|
|
BUG=
R=thakis@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/361553002
|
|
BUG=none
R=bo_xu@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/300023002
|
|
wrong characters representation, and addjust some code indent
BUG=
R=jam@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/294353002
|
|
|
|
|