| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The code to validate the number of parameters happens inside each particular
method, rather than prior to method dispatch. As such, there's no point in
having this number take up space in the table.
Add some test to cover at least some of the per-method validations, and
update error messages to be more useful.
R=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1084183008
|
|
This implements the previously unimplemented JS_Error() function.
Along the way:
- fix some IWYU when the include order in global.cpp was perturbed.
- remove some uses of JS_ErrorString, to increase transparency.
- use vp.IsSetting() in place of !vp.IsGetting() for clarity.
- specify an error string on several error return paths.
- add an error string for writing readonly properties.
- rename an error string constant to reflect the actual message.
- replace calls to variadic Format() with a function doing string appends.
- remove unused JS_GetClassName()
R=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/963193003
|
|
Along the way, I noticed that one of these is used in a header file
that isn't included anywhere and describes no actual code (JS_Console.h).
Also add missing header guards, and IWYU to resources.h
Also move a static function from a header to the new resources.cpp file.
Also fix the grammar on some of the error messages. Most of these
appear to be JS error messages destined for a JS error handler or (someday)
a console (which can remain in english), and oddly, some appear to be about
failed form validation, which smells user-facing.
Also check that the message makes sense for the point the C++ code
wants to use it, and reword accordingly.
As it turns out, these currently don't make it back to JS due to the
unimplemented JS_Error() function; this is an enabling step towards
implementing it.
R=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/955273003
|
|
|
|
|
