| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
(cherry picked from commit 3c012fef2bb72c8ec1faa73e11ee35539b2559d6)
Original Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1243953004 .
R=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1239313005 .
|
|
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1185843005.
|
|
Original Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1171733003
R=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1178613002.
|
|
New manual edits in the following to fix compilation:
fx_bmp.h, fx_gif.h, fx_graphics.h
Original Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1169963003
R=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1170103004
|
|
Move interface comments from the implementation header to the
interface header.
Replace Create / Release functions with static methods.
Replace dubious Release() methods with deletion via virtual dtor, also
for IXFA_App and IXFA_FontMgr while we're at it.
Untabify and fix (theoretically) illegal _CAP include guard definitions
for fpdfxfa/ headers.
R=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1153553003
|
|
Original Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1135913002
BUG=pdfium:154
R=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1136703003
|
|
It's an enhancement requested in issue 452794.
BUG=N/A
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/939483003
|
|
|
|
Should there be cases where this fails to compile, it indicates a mistake,
either an incorrectly declared overrriden virtual method, or a method that
should be declared non-virtual.
The only issues were with CPDF_CustomAccess::GetBlock(), CPDF_CustomAccess::GetByte(),
and CPDF_CustomAccess::GetFullPath(). These don't appear to be used anywhere,
and are removed. Two members are removed that are no longer needed once those
methods are removed.
R=jam@chromium.org, jun_fang@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/454983003
|
|
Calling `delete` on an object of a type that has virtual functions but
not a virtual destructor is questionable: Since the object has virtual functions,
it likely has subclasses, so if it's deleted through the base pointer and the
destructor isn't virtual, the subclass destructor won't be called.
In most cases, the classes getting deleted can just be marked final to tell
the compiler that it can't possibly have subclasses (this also enables the
compiler to generate better code).
Two classes didn't have any sub- or superclasses but virtual functions -
this doesn't make sense, so make all methods of these classes non-virtual.
(Also delete an unused function on one of the two classes.)
In one case, a class actually did have a subclass that needs to be deleted
virtually, so mark one destructor as virtual.
BUG=none
R=bo_xu@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/370853002
|
|
R=jam@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/333753002
|
|
|
|
|
