Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Purely code removal.
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1991143003
|
|
These are the left or newly added code which causes compilation
warnings of "signed and unsigned comparison". Need to fix them
before I re-enable the warning flag.
BUG=pdfium:29
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1986533002
|
|
BUG=
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1979723003
|
|
BUG=pdfium:493
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1968233002
|
|
There are currently three ways to assert in the code (ASSERT, FXSYS_assert and
assert). This CL standardizes on ASSERT. The benefit of ASSERT is that it can
be overridden if the platform requies and we can pickup the Chromium version
if it has already been defined in the build.
This does change behaviour. Currently FXSYS_assert is always defined but ASSERT
is only defined in debug builds. So, the FXSYS_assert's would fire in Release
builds. That will no longer happen.
BUG=pdfium:219
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1914303003
|
|
Too many calls were of the form fn(x.c_str(), x.GetLength())
which is an anti-pattern given the StringC classes which tie
these together.
There are a few places where explicit CFX_*StringCs are
constructed, but this can be avoided by changing the args
to these functions in the same manner.
Removed String_ from name of functions since it added
little value. Also removed default argument.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1919563002
|
|
Use the more standard name "clear()" instead.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1888103002
|
|
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1882043004
|
|
Clean up three 4701 warnings (use potientially uninitialized variable)
which are the only ones left;
Re-enable warning 4701 for GN build;
Remove an unused data structure;
BUG=pdfium:29
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1885093002
|
|
This CL removes IFX_ArabicChar, IFX_RTFBreak, IFX_TxtBreak, IFX_WordBreak,
IFX_FormatString, and IFX_GSUBTable. References were updated to be the concrete
classes.
The CFX_GSUBTable was also removed as it is unused.
BUG=pdfium:468
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1882213002
|
|
The naming is redundant given the base type, and will stand
in the way of consolidating Byte and Wide code.
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1862123003
|
|
No functional change intended.
This difference in naming is standing in the way of consolidating
some of the string code between Wide and Byte strings. The Wide
code wants to call raw_str() in exactly the same spots that the
Byte code calls c_str(). This makes sense, because in both places we
get a character type back, and not a uint*_t type. If WideStringC
had a raw_str() method, it would have to return uint32_t or similar.
R=dsinclair@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1863593004
|
|
Companion to https://codereview.chromium.org/1853233002
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1857073002
|
|
This CL updates CFX_ByteStringC to use the more common c_str
and raw_str instead of GetCStr and GetPtr.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1857713003
|
|
Having this happen implicitly can be dangerous because the lifetime
has to be considered; we should have caught the "red bots" in
https://codereview.chromium.org/1847333004/#ps60001 at compile time.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1853233002
|
|
In XFA, we were constructing some CFX_ string types before
we reached main(). Setting breakpoints on these as well as
main() shows we hit main first after applying the patch.
Doing so also turned up an unused variable, presumably because
the static initializer made it appear used.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1846353002
|
|
Some headers were missed in the previous CL.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1835703002
|
|
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1830323006
|
|
This CL moves the fxcrt code into the core/fxcrt directory. The only exception
was fx_bidi.h which was moved into core/fxcrt as it is not used outside of
core/.
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1825953002 .
|
|
It isn't buying us anthing, and it looks strange in
a struct when other uint types are already present.
R=dsinclair@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1821043003 .
|
|
This CL moves the xfa/src files up to the xfa/ directory and fixes the includes,
include guards, and build files.
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1803723002 .
|