From 62a70f90c49cf7714c960186eb063ad55333e6f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Sepez Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:00:20 -0700 Subject: Remove FX_WORD in favor of uint16_t. It isn't buying us anthing, and it looks strange in a struct when other uint types are already present. R=dsinclair@chromium.org Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1821043003 . --- xfa/fxfa/parser/xfa_basic_data.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'xfa/fxfa/parser/xfa_basic_data.h') diff --git a/xfa/fxfa/parser/xfa_basic_data.h b/xfa/fxfa/parser/xfa_basic_data.h index 8d36650a87..9bc6dcb23b 100644 --- a/xfa/fxfa/parser/xfa_basic_data.h +++ b/xfa/fxfa/parser/xfa_basic_data.h @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ extern const XFA_ELEMENTINFO g_XFAElementData[]; extern const int32_t g_iXFAElementCount; extern const XFA_ELEMENTHIERARCHY g_XFAElementChildrenIndex[]; -extern const FX_WORD g_XFAElementChildrenData[]; +extern const uint16_t g_XFAElementChildrenData[]; extern const XFA_ELEMENTHIERARCHY g_XFAElementAttributeIndex[]; extern const uint8_t g_XFAElementAttributeData[]; -- cgit v1.2.3