summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>2018-01-27 03:15:13 -0800
committerGabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>2018-01-27 20:28:40 +0000
commit66c37275ea3acb768d371c46c06a91d7052db8a8 (patch)
treebfb0b893f0e78591030f10e1aafee83b290bf332
parent3ccef3dd7702530718f145c4c30061688ebe276f (diff)
downloadgem5-66c37275ea3acb768d371c46c06a91d7052db8a8.tar.xz
base: Get bitunions to compile on clang 3.8.
clang was getting very upset and interpretting a member function pointer as a call to the actual underlying function, and then complaining that it was a non-static function call without an instance. It seems what it was really upset about was that the class who's scope the member function pointer belonged to (the current class) wasn't done being defined. This *should* be ok as far as I can tell, but clang was having none of it. This change reworks how the type of the setter function arguments are determined to work around that limitation. The bitunion test was run with clang++ and g++ and both pass, and I've built gem5.opt for ARM successfully. Change-Id: Ib9351784a897af4867fe08045577e0247334ea11 Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/7581 Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com> Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
-rw-r--r--src/base/bitunion.hh33
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/src/base/bitunion.hh b/src/base/bitunion.hh
index 6e7d223d2..38d10dac3 100644
--- a/src/base/bitunion.hh
+++ b/src/base/bitunion.hh
@@ -55,26 +55,31 @@ class BitfieldTypeImpl : public Base
"Bitfield base class must be empty.");
private:
- using Base::setter;
- template<typename T>
- struct TypeDeducer;
+ struct TypeDeducer
+ {
+ template<typename>
+ struct T;
- template<typename T>
- friend class TypeDeducer;
+ template<typename C, typename Type1, typename Type2>
+ struct T<void (C::*)(Type1 &, Type2)>
+ {
+ typedef Type1 Storage;
+ typedef Type2 Type;
+ };
- template<typename Type1, typename Type2>
- struct TypeDeducer<void (Base::*)(Type1 &, Type2)>
- {
- typedef Type1 Storage;
- typedef Type2 Type;
+ struct Wrapper : public Base
+ {
+ using Base::setter;
+ };
+
+ typedef typename T<decltype(&Wrapper::setter)>::Storage Storage;
+ typedef typename T<decltype(&Wrapper::setter)>::Type Type;
};
protected:
- typedef typename TypeDeducer<
- decltype(&BitfieldTypeImpl<Base>::setter)>::Storage Storage;
- typedef typename TypeDeducer<
- decltype(&BitfieldTypeImpl<Base>::setter)>::Type Type;
+ typedef typename TypeDeducer::Storage Storage;
+ typedef typename TypeDeducer::Type Type;
Type getter(const Storage &storage) const = delete;
void setter(Storage &storage, Type val) = delete;