diff options
author | Kevin Lim <ktlim@umich.edu> | 2004-08-20 14:54:07 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Kevin Lim <ktlim@umich.edu> | 2004-08-20 14:54:07 -0400 |
commit | 04745696b6b523c5e90c335298099600d4a14a76 (patch) | |
tree | 66b578f8c44355ccf8e970fe59b52554dde9d0ce /cpu/beta_cpu/iew_impl.hh | |
parent | 8295a8050c1096dc560f4976724adada810e56e1 (diff) | |
download | gem5-04745696b6b523c5e90c335298099600d4a14a76.tar.xz |
Check in of new CPU. This checkin works under non-Fullsystem mode, with no caches.
SConscript:
Added new CPU files to build.
arch/alpha/isa_desc:
Changed rduniq and wruniq to be nonspeculative because the uniq register is not renamed.
arch/isa_parser.py:
Added new CPU exec method.
base/statistics.hh:
Minor change for namespace conflict. Probably can change back one the new CPU files are cleaned up.
base/traceflags.py:
Added new CPU trace flags.
cpu/static_inst.hh:
Changed static inst to use a file that defines the execute functions.
--HG--
extra : convert_revision : bd4ce34361308280168324817fc1258dd253e519
Diffstat (limited to 'cpu/beta_cpu/iew_impl.hh')
-rw-r--r-- | cpu/beta_cpu/iew_impl.hh | 443 |
1 files changed, 443 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/cpu/beta_cpu/iew_impl.hh b/cpu/beta_cpu/iew_impl.hh new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b198220f5 --- /dev/null +++ b/cpu/beta_cpu/iew_impl.hh @@ -0,0 +1,443 @@ +// @todo: Fix the instantaneous communication among all the stages within +// iew. There's a clear delay between issue and execute, yet backwards +// communication happens simultaneously. Might not be that bad really... +// it might skew stats a bit though. Issue would otherwise try to issue +// instructions that would never be executed if there were a delay; without +// it issue will simply squash. Make this stage block properly. Make this +// stage delay after a squash properly. Update the statuses for each stage. +// Actually read instructions out of the skid buffer. + +#include <queue> + +#include "base/timebuf.hh" +#include "cpu/beta_cpu/iew.hh" + +template<class Impl, class IQ> +SimpleIEW<Impl, IQ>::SimpleIEW(Params ¶ms) + : // Just make this time buffer really big for now + issueToExecQueue(20, 20), + instQueue(params), + commitToIEWDelay(params.commitToIEWDelay), + renameToIEWDelay(params.renameToIEWDelay), + issueToExecuteDelay(params.issueToExecuteDelay), + issueReadWidth(params.issueWidth), + issueWidth(params.issueWidth), + executeWidth(params.executeWidth) +{ + DPRINTF(IEW, "IEW: executeIntWidth: %i.\n", params.executeIntWidth); + _status = Idle; + _issueStatus = Idle; + _exeStatus = Idle; + _wbStatus = Idle; + + // Setup wire to read instructions coming from issue. + fromIssue = issueToExecQueue.getWire(-issueToExecuteDelay); + + // Instruction queue needs the queue between issue and execute. + instQueue.setIssueToExecuteQueue(&issueToExecQueue); +} + +template<class Impl, class IQ> +void +SimpleIEW<Impl, IQ>::setCPU(FullCPU *cpu_ptr) +{ + DPRINTF(IEW, "IEW: Setting CPU pointer.\n"); + cpu = cpu_ptr; + + instQueue.setCPU(cpu_ptr); +} + +template<class Impl, class IQ> +void +SimpleIEW<Impl, IQ>::setTimeBuffer(TimeBuffer<TimeStruct> *tb_ptr) +{ + DPRINTF(IEW, "IEW: Setting time buffer pointer.\n"); + timeBuffer = tb_ptr; + + // Setup wire to read information from time buffer, from commit. + fromCommit = timeBuffer->getWire(-commitToIEWDelay); + + // Setup wire to write information back to previous stages. + toRename = timeBuffer->getWire(0); + + // Instruction queue also needs main time buffer. + instQueue.setTimeBuffer(tb_ptr); +} + +template<class Impl, class IQ> +void +SimpleIEW<Impl, IQ>::setRenameQueue(TimeBuffer<RenameStruct> *rq_ptr) +{ + DPRINTF(IEW, "IEW: Setting rename queue pointer.\n"); + renameQueue = rq_ptr; + + // Setup wire to read information from rename queue. + fromRename = renameQueue->getWire(-renameToIEWDelay); +} + +template<class Impl, class IQ> +void +SimpleIEW<Impl, IQ>::setIEWQueue(TimeBuffer<IEWStruct> *iq_ptr) +{ + DPRINTF(IEW, "IEW: Setting IEW queue pointer.\n"); + iewQueue = iq_ptr; + + // Setup wire to write instructions to commit. + toCommit = iewQueue->getWire(0); +} + +template<class Impl, class IQ> +void +SimpleIEW<Impl, IQ>::setRenameMap(RenameMap *rm_ptr) +{ + DPRINTF(IEW, "IEW: Setting rename map pointer.\n"); + renameMap = rm_ptr; +} + +template<class Impl, class IQ> +void +SimpleIEW<Impl, IQ>::wakeDependents(DynInst *inst) +{ + instQueue.wakeDependents(inst); +} + +template<class Impl, class IQ> +void +SimpleIEW<Impl, IQ>::block() +{ + DPRINTF(IEW, "IEW: Blocking.\n"); + // Set the status to Blocked. + _status = Blocked; + + // Add the current inputs to the skid buffer so they can be + // reprocessed when this stage unblocks. + skidBuffer.push(*fromRename); + + // Note that this stage only signals previous stages to stall when + // it is the cause of the stall originates at this stage. Otherwise + // the previous stages are expected to check all possible stall signals. +} + +template<class Impl, class IQ> +inline void +SimpleIEW<Impl, IQ>::unblock() +{ + // Check if there's information in the skid buffer. If there is, then + // set status to unblocking, otherwise set it directly to running. + DPRINTF(IEW, "IEW: Reading instructions out of the skid " + "buffer.\n"); + // Remove the now processed instructions from the skid buffer. + skidBuffer.pop(); + + // If there's still information in the skid buffer, then + // continue to tell previous stages to stall. They will be + // able to restart once the skid buffer is empty. + if (!skidBuffer.empty()) { + toRename->iewInfo.stall = true; + } else { + DPRINTF(IEW, "IEW: Stage is done unblocking.\n"); + _status = Running; + } +} + +template<class Impl, class IQ> +void +SimpleIEW<Impl, IQ>::squash() +{ + DPRINTF(IEW, "IEW: Squashing all instructions.\n"); + _status = Squashing; + + // Tell the IQ to start squashing. + instQueue.squash(); + + // Tell rename to squash through the time buffer. + // This communication may be redundant depending upon where squash() + // is called. +// toRename->iewInfo.squash = true; +} + +template<class Impl, class IQ> +void +SimpleIEW<Impl, IQ>::squash(DynInst *inst) +{ + DPRINTF(IEW, "IEW: Squashing from a specific instruction, PC:%#x.\n", + inst->PC); + // Perhaps leave the squashing up to the ROB stage to tell it when to + // squash? + _status = Squashing; + + // Tell rename to squash through the time buffer. + toRename->iewInfo.squash = true; + // Also send PC update information back to prior stages. + toRename->iewInfo.squashedSeqNum = inst->seqNum; + toRename->iewInfo.nextPC = inst->readCalcTarg(); + toRename->iewInfo.predIncorrect = true; +} + +template<class Impl, class IQ> +void +SimpleIEW<Impl, IQ>::tick() +{ + // Considering putting all the state-determining stuff in this section. + + // Try to fill up issue queue with as many instructions as bandwidth + // allows. + // Decode should try to execute as many instructions as its bandwidth + // will allow, as long as it is not currently blocked. + + // Check if the stage is in a running status. + if (_status != Blocked && _status != Squashing) { + DPRINTF(IEW, "IEW: Status is not blocked, attempting to run " + "stage.\n"); + iew(); + + // If it's currently unblocking, check to see if it should switch + // to running. + if (_status == Unblocking) { + unblock(); + } + } else if (_status == Squashing) { + + DPRINTF(IEW, "IEW: Still squashing.\n"); + + // Check if stage should remain squashing. Stop squashing if the + // squash signal clears. + if (!fromCommit->commitInfo.squash && + !fromCommit->commitInfo.robSquashing) { + DPRINTF(IEW, "IEW: Done squashing, changing status to " + "running.\n"); + + _status = Running; + instQueue.stopSquash(); + } else { + instQueue.doSquash(); + } + + // Also should advance its own time buffers if the stage ran. + // Not sure about this... +// issueToExecQueue.advance(); + } else if (_status == Blocked) { + // Continue to tell previous stage to stall. + toRename->iewInfo.stall = true; + + // Check if possible stall conditions have cleared. + if (!fromCommit->commitInfo.stall && + !instQueue.isFull()) { + DPRINTF(IEW, "IEW: Stall signals cleared, going to unblock.\n"); + _status = Unblocking; + } + + // If there's still instructions coming from rename, continue to + // put them on the skid buffer. + if (fromRename->insts[0] != NULL) { + block(); + } + + if (fromCommit->commitInfo.squash || + fromCommit->commitInfo.robSquashing) { + squash(); + } + } + + // @todo: Maybe put these at the beginning, so if it's idle it can + // return early. + // Write back number of free IQ entries here. + toRename->iewInfo.freeIQEntries = instQueue.numFreeEntries(); + + DPRINTF(IEW, "IEW: IQ has %i free entries.\n", + instQueue.numFreeEntries()); +} + +template<class Impl, class IQ> +void +SimpleIEW<Impl, IQ>::iew() +{ + // Might want to put all state checks in the tick() function. + // Check if being told to stall from commit. + if (fromCommit->commitInfo.stall) { + block(); + return; + } else if (fromCommit->commitInfo.squash || + fromCommit->commitInfo.robSquashing) { + // Also check if commit is telling this stage to squash. + squash(); + return; + } + + //////////////////////////////////////// + //ISSUE stage + //////////////////////////////////////// + + //Put into its own function? + //Add instructions to IQ if there are any instructions there + + // Check if there are any instructions coming from rename, and we're. + // not squashing. + if (fromRename->insts[0] != NULL && _status != Squashing) { + + // Loop through the instructions, putting them in the instruction + // queue. + for (int inst_num = 0; inst_num < issueReadWidth; ++inst_num) + { + DynInst *inst = fromRename->insts[inst_num]; + + // Make sure there's a valid instruction there. + if (inst == NULL) + break; + + DPRINTF(IEW, "IEW: Issue: Adding PC %#x to IQ.\n", + inst->readPC()); + + // If it's a memory reference, don't put it in the + // instruction queue. These will only be executed at commit. + // Do the same for nonspeculative instructions and nops. + // Be sure to mark these instructions as ready so that the + // commit stage can go ahead and execute them, and mark + // them as issued so the IQ doesn't reprocess them. + if (inst->isMemRef()) { + DPRINTF(IEW, "IEW: Issue: Memory instruction " + "encountered, skipping.\n"); + + inst->setIssued(); + inst->setExecuted(); + inst->setCanCommit(); + + instQueue.advanceTail(inst); + continue; + } else if (inst->isNonSpeculative()) { + DPRINTF(IEW, "IEW: Issue: Nonspeculative instruction " + "encountered, skipping.\n"); + + inst->setIssued(); + inst->setExecuted(); + inst->setCanCommit(); + + instQueue.advanceTail(inst); + continue; + } else if (inst->isNop()) { + DPRINTF(IEW, "IEW: Issue: Nop instruction encountered " + ", skipping.\n"); + + inst->setIssued(); + inst->setExecuted(); + inst->setCanCommit(); + + instQueue.advanceTail(inst); + continue; + } else if (instQueue.isFull()) { + DPRINTF(IEW, "IEW: Issue: IQ has become full.\n"); + // Call function to start blocking. + block(); + // Tell previous stage to stall. + toRename->iewInfo.stall = true; + break; + } + + // If the instruction queue is not full, then add the + // instruction. + instQueue.insert(fromRename->insts[inst_num]); + } + } + + // Have the instruction queue try to schedule any ready instructions. + instQueue.scheduleReadyInsts(); + + //////////////////////////////////////// + //EXECUTE/WRITEBACK stage + //////////////////////////////////////// + + //Put into its own function? + //Similarly should probably have separate execution for int vs FP. + // Above comment is handled by the issue queue only issuing a valid + // mix of int/fp instructions. + //Actually okay to just have one execution, buuuuuut will need + //somewhere that defines the execution latency of all instructions. + // @todo: Move to the FU pool used in the current full cpu. + + int fu_usage = 0; + + // Execute/writeback any instructions that are available. + for (int inst_num = 0; + fu_usage < executeWidth && /* Haven't exceeded available FU's. */ + inst_num < issueWidth && /* Haven't exceeded issue width. */ + fromIssue->insts[inst_num]; /* There are available instructions. */ + ++inst_num) { + DPRINTF(IEW, "IEW: Execute: Executing instructions from IQ.\n"); + + // Get instruction from issue's queue. + DynInst *inst = fromIssue->insts[inst_num]; + + DPRINTF(IEW, "IEW: Execute: Processing PC %#x.\n", inst->readPC()); + + inst->setExecuted(); + + // Check if the instruction is squashed; if so then skip it + // and don't count it towards the FU usage. + if (inst->isSquashed()) { + DPRINTF(IEW, "IEW: Execute: Instruction was squashed.\n"); + continue; + } + + // If an instruction is executed, then count it towards FU usage. + ++fu_usage; + + // Execute instruction. + // Note that if the instruction faults, it will be handled + // at the commit stage. + inst->execute(); + + // First check the time slot that this instruction will write + // to. If there are free write ports at the time, then go ahead + // and write the instruction to that time. If there are not, + // keep looking back to see where's the first time there's a + // free slot. What happens if you run out of free spaces? + // For now naively assume that all instructions take one cycle. + // Otherwise would have to look into the time buffer based on the + // latency of the instruction. + + // Add finished instruction to queue to commit. + toCommit->insts[inst_num] = inst; + + // Check if branch was correct. This check happens after the + // instruction is added to the queue because even if the branch + // is mispredicted, the branch instruction itself is still valid. + if (inst->mispredicted()) { + DPRINTF(IEW, "IEW: Execute: Branch mispredict detected.\n"); + DPRINTF(IEW, "IEW: Execute: Redirecting fetch to PC: %#x.\n", + inst->nextPC); + + // If incorrect, then signal the ROB that it must be squashed. + squash(inst); + + // Not sure it really needs to break. +// break; + } + } + + // Loop through the head of the time buffer and wake any dependents. + // These instructions are about to write back. In the simple model + // this loop can really happen within the previous loop, but when + // instructions have actual latencies, this loop must be separate. + // Also mark scoreboard that this instruction is finally complete. + // Either have IEW have direct access to rename map, or have this as + // part of backwards communication. + for (int inst_num = 0; inst_num < executeWidth && + toCommit->insts[inst_num] != NULL; inst_num++) + { + DynInst *inst = toCommit->insts[inst_num]; + + DPRINTF(IEW, "IEW: Sending instructions to commit, PC %#x.\n", + inst->readPC()); + + instQueue.wakeDependents(inst); + + for (int i = 0; i < inst->numDestRegs(); i++) + { + renameMap->markAsReady(inst->renamedDestRegIdx(i)); + } + } + + // Also should advance its own time buffers if the stage ran. + // Not the best place for it, but this works (hopefully). + issueToExecQueue.advance(); +} |