base, sim, dev: Remove SWIG

Remove SWIG guards and SWIG-specific C++ code.

Change-Id: Icaad6720513b6f48153727ef3f70e0dba0df4bee
Signed-off-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Curtis Dunham <curtis.dunham@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/2921
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Gutierrez <anthony.gutierrez@amd.com>

3 files changed, 1 insertions, 23 deletions

diff --git a/src/base/addr_range.hh b/src/base/addr_range.hh
index ed0259ff7..1137efa28 100644
--- a/src/base/addr_range.hh
+++ b/src/base/addr_range.hh
@@ -346,11 +346,6 @@ class AddrRange
         return false;
     }
 
-/**
- * Keep the operators away from SWIG.
- */
-#ifndef SWIG
-
     /**
      * Less-than operator used to turn an STL map into a binary search
      * tree of non-overlapping address ranges.
@@ -384,7 +379,6 @@ class AddrRange
     {
         return !(*this == r);
     }
-#endif // SWIG
 };
 
 /**
diff --git a/src/base/types.cc b/src/base/types.cc
index 38b6bf2b2..ee918a4ed 100644
--- a/src/base/types.cc
+++ b/src/base/types.cc
@@ -30,8 +30,6 @@
 
 #include "base/types.hh"
 
-#ifndef SWIG // keep the operators away from SWIG
-
 std::ostream&
 operator<<(std::ostream &out, const Cycles & cycles)
 {
@@ -39,5 +37,3 @@ operator<<(std::ostream &out, const Cycles & cycles)
     return out;
 }
 
-#endif // SWIG not touching operators
-
diff --git a/src/base/types.hh b/src/base/types.hh
index 7b115901a..05a29f8bd 100644
--- a/src/base/types.hh
+++ b/src/base/types.hh
@@ -73,8 +73,7 @@ const Tick MaxTick = ULL(0xffffffffffffffff);
  * typedef, aiming to avoid unintentional mixing of cycles and ticks
  * in the code base.
  *
- * Operators are defined inside an ifndef block to avoid swig touching
- * them. Note that there is no overloading of the bool operator as the
+ * Note that there is no overloading of the bool operator as the
  * compiler is allowed to turn booleans into integers and this causes
  * a whole range of issues in a handful locations. The solution to
  * this problem would be to use the safe bool idiom, but for now we
@@ -91,18 +90,12 @@ class Cycles
 
   public:
 
-#ifndef SWIG // SWIG gets confused by constexpr
     /** Explicit constructor assigning a value. */
     explicit constexpr Cycles(uint64_t _c) : c(_c) { }
-#else
-    explicit Cycles(uint64_t _c) : c(_c) { }
-#endif
 
     /** Default constructor for parameter classes. */
     Cycles() : c(0) { }
 
-#ifndef SWIG // keep the operators away from SWIG
-
     /** Converting back to the value type. */
     constexpr operator uint64_t() const { return c; }
 
@@ -138,9 +131,6 @@ class Cycles
     { return Cycles(c >> shift); }
 
     friend std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream &out, const Cycles & cycles);
-
-#endif // SWIG not touching operators
-
 };
 
 /**
@@ -194,11 +184,9 @@ const PortID InvalidPortID = (PortID)-1;
 class FaultBase;
 typedef std::shared_ptr<FaultBase> Fault;
 
-#ifndef SWIG // Swig gets really confused by decltype
 // Rather than creating a shared_ptr instance and assigning it nullptr,
 // we just create an alias.
 constexpr decltype(nullptr) NoFault = nullptr;
-#endif
 
 struct AtomicOpFunctor
 {