MEM: Use base class Master/SlavePort pointers in the bus

This patch makes some rather trivial simplifications to the bus in
that it changes the use of BusMasterPort and BusSlavePort pointers to
simply use MasterPort and SlavePort (iterators are also updated
accordingly).

This change is a step towards a future patch that introduces a
separation of the interface and the structural port itself.

1 files changed, 21 insertions, 25 deletions

diff --git a/src/mem/bus.cc b/src/mem/bus.cc
index 488c3c4cb..911276f75 100644
--- a/src/mem/bus.cc
+++ b/src/mem/bus.cc
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ Bus::Bus(const BusParams *p)
     // are enumerated starting from zero
     for (int i = 0; i < p->port_master_connection_count; ++i) {
         std::string portName = csprintf("%s-p%d", name(), i);
-        BusMasterPort* bp = new BusMasterPort(portName, this, i);
+        MasterPort* bp = new BusMasterPort(portName, this, i);
         masterPorts.push_back(bp);
     }
 
@@ -84,14 +84,14 @@ Bus::Bus(const BusParams *p)
     if (p->port_default_connection_count) {
         defaultPortId = masterPorts.size();
         std::string portName = csprintf("%s-default", name());
-        BusMasterPort* bp = new BusMasterPort(portName, this, defaultPortId);
+        MasterPort* bp = new BusMasterPort(portName, this, defaultPortId);
         masterPorts.push_back(bp);
     }
 
     // create the slave ports, once again starting at zero
     for (int i = 0; i < p->port_slave_connection_count; ++i) {
         std::string portName = csprintf("%s-p%d", name(), i);
-        BusSlavePort* bp = new BusSlavePort(portName, this, i);
+        SlavePort* bp = new BusSlavePort(portName, this, i);
         slavePorts.push_back(bp);
     }
 
@@ -125,11 +125,10 @@ Bus::getSlavePort(const std::string &if_name, int idx)
 void
 Bus::init()
 {
-    std::vector<BusSlavePort*>::iterator p;
-
     // iterate over our slave ports and determine which of our
     // neighbouring master ports are snooping and add them as snoopers
-    for (p = slavePorts.begin(); p != slavePorts.end(); ++p) {
+    for (SlavePortConstIter p = slavePorts.begin(); p != slavePorts.end();
+         ++p) {
         if ((*p)->getMasterPort().isSnooping()) {
             DPRINTF(BusAddrRanges, "Adding snooping neighbour %s\n",
                     (*p)->getMasterPort().name());
@@ -397,9 +396,8 @@ Bus::succeededTiming(Tick busy_time)
 void
 Bus::forwardTiming(PacketPtr pkt, int exclude_slave_port_id)
 {
-    SnoopIter s_end = snoopPorts.end();
-    for (SnoopIter s_iter = snoopPorts.begin(); s_iter != s_end; s_iter++) {
-        BusSlavePort *p = *s_iter;
+    for (SlavePortIter s = snoopPorts.begin(); s != snoopPorts.end(); ++s) {
+        SlavePort *p = *s;
         // we could have gotten this request from a snooping master
         // (corresponding to our own slave port that is also in
         // snoopPorts) and should not send it back to where it came
@@ -594,9 +592,8 @@ Bus::forwardAtomic(PacketPtr pkt, int exclude_slave_port_id)
     MemCmd snoop_response_cmd = MemCmd::InvalidCmd;
     Tick snoop_response_latency = 0;
 
-    SnoopIter s_end = snoopPorts.end();
-    for (SnoopIter s_iter = snoopPorts.begin(); s_iter != s_end; s_iter++) {
-        BusSlavePort *p = *s_iter;
+    for (SlavePortIter s = snoopPorts.begin(); s != snoopPorts.end(); ++s) {
+        SlavePort *p = *s;
         // we could have gotten this request from a snooping master
         // (corresponding to our own slave port that is also in
         // snoopPorts) and should not send it back to where it came
@@ -676,9 +673,8 @@ Bus::recvFunctionalSnoop(PacketPtr pkt)
 void
 Bus::forwardFunctional(PacketPtr pkt, int exclude_slave_port_id)
 {
-    SnoopIter s_end = snoopPorts.end();
-    for (SnoopIter s_iter = snoopPorts.begin(); s_iter != s_end; s_iter++) {
-        BusSlavePort *p = *s_iter;
+    for (SlavePortIter s = snoopPorts.begin(); s != snoopPorts.end(); ++s) {
+        SlavePort *p = *s;
         // we could have gotten this request from a snooping master
         // (corresponding to our own slave port that is also in
         // snoopPorts) and should not send it back to where it came
@@ -723,7 +719,7 @@ Bus::recvRangeChange(Port::PortId id)
     } else {
 
         assert(id < masterPorts.size() && id >= 0);
-        BusMasterPort *port = masterPorts[id];
+        MasterPort *port = masterPorts[id];
 
         // Clean out any previously existent ids
         for (PortIter portIter = portMap.begin();
@@ -749,12 +745,11 @@ Bus::recvRangeChange(Port::PortId id)
     }
     DPRINTF(BusAddrRanges, "port list has %d entries\n", portMap.size());
 
-    // tell all our peers that our address range has changed.
-    // Don't tell the device that caused this change, it already knows
-    std::vector<BusSlavePort*>::const_iterator intIter;
-
-    for (intIter = slavePorts.begin(); intIter != slavePorts.end(); intIter++)
-        (*intIter)->sendRangeChange();
+    // tell all our neighbouring master ports that our address range
+    // has changed
+    for (SlavePortConstIter p = slavePorts.begin(); p != slavePorts.end();
+         ++p)
+        (*p)->sendRangeChange();
 
     inRecvRangeChange.erase(id);
 }
@@ -821,9 +816,10 @@ Bus::findBlockSize(Port::PortId id)
         if (tmp_bs > max_bs)
             max_bs = tmp_bs;
     }
-    SnoopIter s_end = snoopPorts.end();
-    for (SnoopIter s_iter = snoopPorts.begin(); s_iter != s_end; s_iter++) {
-        unsigned tmp_bs = (*s_iter)->peerBlockSize();
+
+    for (SlavePortConstIter s = snoopPorts.begin(); s != snoopPorts.end();
+         ++s) {
+        unsigned tmp_bs = (*s)->peerBlockSize();
         if (tmp_bs > max_bs)
             max_bs = tmp_bs;
     }