diff options
author | Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> | 2016-05-26 11:56:24 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com> | 2016-05-26 11:56:24 +0100 |
commit | e3e808416f92d5558d17731fd31c002d84d40181 (patch) | |
tree | a1e613974a368d5680ad6e90b6701b1ed5c4b4ec /src/mem/cache/cache.cc | |
parent | 4d577ac8f18e08290e4536803d564ad85e3c3a88 (diff) | |
download | gem5-e3e808416f92d5558d17731fd31c002d84d40181.tar.xz |
mem: Fix memory leak in handling of deferred snoops
This patch fixes a memory leak where deferred snoop packets never got
deallocated. On the call to MSHR::handleSnoop these snoops were
treated as if a response will be sent, as the MSHR was
pendingModified. Consequently, a copy of the packet was created and
added to the MSHR targets. However, an preceeding target to the same
MSHR, originally from a CPU, was serviced before the snoop, and caused
the block to be invalidated. This happens for ReadExReq and
UpgradeReq.
Note that the original snoop will receive a response, just not from
the cache in question, but instead from the cache upstream that issued
the ReadExReq or UpgradeReq.
Change-Id: I4ac012fbc8a46cf693ca390fe9476105d444e6f4
Reviewed-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'src/mem/cache/cache.cc')
-rw-r--r-- | src/mem/cache/cache.cc | 14 |
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/mem/cache/cache.cc b/src/mem/cache/cache.cc index 3048973fb..e6247823c 100644 --- a/src/mem/cache/cache.cc +++ b/src/mem/cache/cache.cc @@ -1954,6 +1954,19 @@ Cache::handleSnoop(PacketPtr pkt, CacheBlk *blk, bool is_timing, } if (!blk || !blk->isValid()) { + if (is_deferred) { + // we no longer have the block, and will not respond, but a + // packet was allocated in MSHR::handleSnoop and we have + // to delete it + assert(pkt->needsResponse()); + + // we have passed the block to a cache upstream, that + // cache should be responding + assert(pkt->cacheResponding()); + + delete pkt; + } + DPRINTF(CacheVerbose, "%s snoop miss for %s addr %#llx size %d\n", __func__, pkt->cmdString(), pkt->getAddr(), pkt->getSize()); return snoop_delay; @@ -2045,6 +2058,7 @@ Cache::handleSnoop(PacketPtr pkt, CacheBlk *blk, bool is_timing, // responding, then we've made a copy of both the request and // the packet, delete them here assert(pkt->needsResponse()); + assert(!pkt->cacheResponding()); delete pkt->req; delete pkt; } |