diff options
| author | Nilay Vaish <nilay@cs.wisc.edu> | 2013-12-20 20:34:04 -0600 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Nilay Vaish <nilay@cs.wisc.edu> | 2013-12-20 20:34:04 -0600 |
| commit | fc53f9ffcc880a5429fb41a881bc095bf200e4a4 (patch) | |
| tree | 398d012bd772b37673e3046aad5ca3d48e872ec4 /src/mem/ruby/slicc_interface/AbstractController.cc | |
| parent | 30b259a31eb8e2b4dc5aaef2705ee3896a457062 (diff) | |
| download | gem5-fc53f9ffcc880a5429fb41a881bc095bf200e4a4.tar.xz | |
ruby: slicc: replace max_in_port_rank with number of inports
This patch replaces max_in_port_rank with the number of inports. The use of
max_in_port_rank was causing spurious re-builds and incorrect initialization
of variables in ruby related regression tests. This was due to the variable
value being used across threads while compiling when it was not meant to be.
Since the number of inports is state machine specific value, this problem
should get solved.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/mem/ruby/slicc_interface/AbstractController.cc')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/mem/ruby/slicc_interface/AbstractController.cc | 8 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/src/mem/ruby/slicc_interface/AbstractController.cc b/src/mem/ruby/slicc_interface/AbstractController.cc index 2e4109c01..26cf91e9f 100644 --- a/src/mem/ruby/slicc_interface/AbstractController.cc +++ b/src/mem/ruby/slicc_interface/AbstractController.cc @@ -104,10 +104,10 @@ AbstractController::stallBuffer(MessageBuffer* buf, Address addr) { if (m_waiting_buffers.count(addr) == 0) { MsgVecType* msgVec = new MsgVecType; - msgVec->resize(m_max_in_port_rank, NULL); + msgVec->resize(m_in_ports, NULL); m_waiting_buffers[addr] = msgVec; } - (*(m_waiting_buffers[addr]))[m_cur_in_port_rank] = buf; + (*(m_waiting_buffers[addr]))[m_cur_in_port] = buf; } void @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ AbstractController::wakeUpBuffers(Address addr) // Wake up all possible lower rank (i.e. lower priority) buffers that could // be waiting on this message. // - for (int in_port_rank = m_cur_in_port_rank - 1; + for (int in_port_rank = m_cur_in_port - 1; in_port_rank >= 0; in_port_rank--) { if ((*(m_waiting_buffers[addr]))[in_port_rank] != NULL) { @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ AbstractController::wakeUpAllBuffers(Address addr) // Wake up all possible lower rank (i.e. lower priority) buffers that could // be waiting on this message. // - for (int in_port_rank = m_max_in_port_rank - 1; + for (int in_port_rank = m_in_ports - 1; in_port_rank >= 0; in_port_rank--) { if ((*(m_waiting_buffers[addr]))[in_port_rank] != NULL) { |