diff options
author | Joel Hestness <jthestness@gmail.com> | 2013-04-09 16:25:30 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Joel Hestness <jthestness@gmail.com> | 2013-04-09 16:25:30 -0500 |
commit | 1583056de8d5d9698cfeb87fb72a80e532e275c3 (patch) | |
tree | 0c20a636a5a3b030cbf89ee14919bc126e1411af /src/mem/ruby/system/RubyPort.cc | |
parent | 46d4b71aa244da24453d86184f3cf2ba8b5bdbac (diff) | |
download | gem5-1583056de8d5d9698cfeb87fb72a80e532e275c3.tar.xz |
Ruby: Fix RubyPort evict packet memory leak
When using the o3 or inorder CPUs with many Ruby protocols, the caches may
need to forward invalidations to the CPUs. The RubyPort was instantiating a
packet to be sent to the CPUs to signal the eviction, but the packets were
not being freed by the CPUs. Consistent with the classic memory model, stack
allocate the packet and heap allocate the request so on
ruby_eviction_callback() completion, the packet deconstructor is called, and
deletes the request (*Note: stack allocating the request causes double
deletion, since it will be deleted in the packet destructor). This results in
the least memory allocations without memory errors.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/mem/ruby/system/RubyPort.cc')
-rw-r--r-- | src/mem/ruby/system/RubyPort.cc | 13 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/src/mem/ruby/system/RubyPort.cc b/src/mem/ruby/system/RubyPort.cc index 4cfc1f252..1ebc1b0f6 100644 --- a/src/mem/ruby/system/RubyPort.cc +++ b/src/mem/ruby/system/RubyPort.cc @@ -496,14 +496,19 @@ void RubyPort::ruby_eviction_callback(const Address& address) { DPRINTF(RubyPort, "Sending invalidations.\n"); - // should this really be using funcMasterId? - Request req(address.getAddress(), 0, 0, Request::funcMasterId); + // This request is deleted in the stack-allocated packet destructor + // when this function exits + // TODO: should this really be using funcMasterId? + RequestPtr req = + new Request(address.getAddress(), 0, 0, Request::funcMasterId); + // Use a single packet to signal all snooping ports of the invalidation. + // This assumes that snooping ports do NOT modify the packet/request + Packet pkt(req, MemCmd::InvalidationReq); for (CpuPortIter p = slave_ports.begin(); p != slave_ports.end(); ++p) { // check if the connected master port is snooping if ((*p)->isSnooping()) { - Packet *pkt = new Packet(&req, MemCmd::InvalidationReq); // send as a snoop request - (*p)->sendTimingSnoopReq(pkt); + (*p)->sendTimingSnoopReq(&pkt); } } } |