summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/mem/xbar.cc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>2018-04-18 11:56:08 +0100
committerNikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>2018-06-19 14:24:25 +0000
commit683f411dcab4bb2275902f79f32eeee7c2e0b00a (patch)
tree0e390a261dbab91766f881bd4330e4ee14d4ee3c /src/mem/xbar.cc
parent699ef82eba4ffe4ba49645968d2969b56599b617 (diff)
downloadgem5-683f411dcab4bb2275902f79f32eeee7c2e0b00a.tar.xz
base, mem: Disambiguate if an addr range is contained or overlaps
We need to determined whether an address range is fully contained or it overlaps with an address range in the address range in the mmap. As an example, we use address range maps to associate ports to address ranges and we determine which port we will forward the request based on which address range contains the addresses accessed by the request. We also need to make sure that when we add a new port to the address range map, its address range does not overlap with any of the existing ports. This patch splits the function find() into two functions contains() and intersects() to implement this distinct functionality. It also changes the xbar and the physical memory to use the right function. Change-Id: If3fd3f774a16b27db2df76dc04f1d61824938008 Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/11115 Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br> Maintainer: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'src/mem/xbar.cc')
-rw-r--r--src/mem/xbar.cc11
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/src/mem/xbar.cc b/src/mem/xbar.cc
index db0bf180e..1984a94aa 100644
--- a/src/mem/xbar.cc
+++ b/src/mem/xbar.cc
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/*
- * Copyright (c) 2011-2015 ARM Limited
+ * Copyright (c) 2011-2015, 2018 ARM Limited
* All rights reserved
*
* The license below extends only to copyright in the software and shall
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ BaseXBar::findPort(Addr addr)
return dest_id;
// Check the address map interval tree
- auto i = portMap.find(addr);
+ auto i = portMap.contains(addr);
if (i != portMap.end()) {
dest_id = i->second;
updatePortCache(dest_id, i->first);
@@ -420,8 +420,9 @@ BaseXBar::recvRangeChange(PortID master_port_id)
DPRINTF(AddrRanges, "Adding range %s for id %d\n",
r.to_string(), master_port_id);
if (portMap.insert(r, master_port_id) == portMap.end()) {
- PortID conflict_id = portMap.find(r)->second;
- fatal("%s has two ports responding within range %s:\n\t%s\n\t%s\n",
+ PortID conflict_id = portMap.intersects(r)->second;
+ fatal("%s has two ports responding within range "
+ "%s:\n\t%s\n\t%s\n",
name(),
r.to_string(),
masterPorts[master_port_id]->getSlavePort().name(),
@@ -496,7 +497,7 @@ BaseXBar::recvRangeChange(PortID master_port_id)
}
}
- // also check that no range partially overlaps with the
+ // also check that no range partially intersects with the
// default range, this has to be done after all ranges are set
// as there are no guarantees for when the default range is
// update with respect to the other ones