diff options
author | Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com> | 2016-12-05 16:48:19 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com> | 2016-12-05 16:48:19 -0500 |
commit | 0bd9dfb8dee9afae4f87b89435c11fa581a71983 (patch) | |
tree | 6339641038d51b40b7410e9c1ee862aef63bf11d /src | |
parent | d28c2906f4125ce8704ce9cefa471f1a5050eeae (diff) | |
download | gem5-0bd9dfb8dee9afae4f87b89435c11fa581a71983.tar.xz |
mem: Service only the 1st FromCPU MSHR target on ReadRespWithInv
A response to a ReadReq can either be a ReadResp or a
ReadRespWithInvalidate. As we add targets to an MSHR for a ReadReq we
assume that the response will be a ReadResp. When the response is
invalidating (ReadRespWithInvalidate) servicing more than one targets
can potentially violate the memory ordering. This change fixes the way
we handle a ReadRespWithInvalidate. When a cache receives a
ReadRespWithInvalidate we service only the first FromCPU target and
all the FromSnoop targets from the MSHR target list. The rest of the
FromCPU targets are deferred and serviced by a new request.
Change-Id: I75c30c268851987ee5f8644acb46f440b4eeeec2
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephan Diestelhorst <stephan.diestelhorst@arm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'src')
-rw-r--r-- | src/mem/cache/cache.cc | 18 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/mem/cache/mshr.cc | 50 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/mem/cache/mshr.hh | 34 |
3 files changed, 83 insertions, 19 deletions
diff --git a/src/mem/cache/cache.cc b/src/mem/cache/cache.cc index db982c1f0..b7f336da9 100644 --- a/src/mem/cache/cache.cc +++ b/src/mem/cache/cache.cc @@ -1330,12 +1330,10 @@ Cache::recvTimingResp(PacketPtr pkt) int initial_offset = initial_tgt->pkt->getOffset(blkSize); bool from_cache = false; - - while (mshr->hasTargets()) { - MSHR::Target *target = mshr->getTarget(); - Packet *tgt_pkt = target->pkt; - - switch (target->source) { + MSHR::TargetList targets = mshr->extractServiceableTargets(pkt); + for (auto &target: targets) { + Packet *tgt_pkt = target.pkt; + switch (target.source) { case MSHR::Target::FromCPU: Tick completion_time; // Here we charge on completion_time the delay of the xbar if the @@ -1370,7 +1368,7 @@ Cache::recvTimingResp(PacketPtr pkt) mshr->promoteWritable(); // NB: we use the original packet here and not the response! blk = handleFill(tgt_pkt, blk, writebacks, - mshr->allocOnFill()); + targets.allocOnFill); assert(blk != nullptr); // treat as a fill, and discard the invalidation @@ -1400,7 +1398,7 @@ Cache::recvTimingResp(PacketPtr pkt) assert(tgt_pkt->req->masterId() < system->maxMasters()); missLatency[tgt_pkt->cmdToIndex()][tgt_pkt->req->masterId()] += - completion_time - target->recvTime; + completion_time - target.recvTime; } else if (pkt->cmd == MemCmd::UpgradeFailResp) { // failed StoreCond upgrade assert(tgt_pkt->cmd == MemCmd::StoreCondReq || @@ -1462,10 +1460,8 @@ Cache::recvTimingResp(PacketPtr pkt) break; default: - panic("Illegal target->source enum %d\n", target->source); + panic("Illegal target->source enum %d\n", target.source); } - - mshr->popTarget(); } maintainClusivity(from_cache, blk); diff --git a/src/mem/cache/mshr.cc b/src/mem/cache/mshr.cc index 86e77b186..e3ee44cc6 100644 --- a/src/mem/cache/mshr.cc +++ b/src/mem/cache/mshr.cc @@ -190,6 +190,7 @@ MSHR::TargetList::clearDownstreamPending() if (mshr != nullptr) { mshr->clearDownstreamPending(); } + t.markedPending = false; } } } @@ -455,17 +456,54 @@ MSHR::handleSnoop(PacketPtr pkt, Counter _order) return true; } +MSHR::TargetList +MSHR::extractServiceableTargets(PacketPtr pkt) +{ + TargetList ready_targets; + // If the downstream MSHR got an invalidation request then we only + // service the first of the FromCPU targets and any other + // non-FromCPU target. This way the remaining FromCPU targets + // issue a new request and get a fresh copy of the block and we + // avoid memory consistency violations. + if (pkt->cmd == MemCmd::ReadRespWithInvalidate) { + auto it = targets.begin(); + assert(it->source == Target::FromCPU); + ready_targets.push_back(*it); + it = targets.erase(it); + while (it != targets.end()) { + if (it->source == Target::FromCPU) { + it++; + } else { + assert(it->source == Target::FromSnoop); + ready_targets.push_back(*it); + it = targets.erase(it); + } + } + ready_targets.populateFlags(); + } else { + std::swap(ready_targets, targets); + } + targets.populateFlags(); + + return ready_targets; +} bool MSHR::promoteDeferredTargets() { - assert(targets.empty()); - if (deferredTargets.empty()) { - return false; - } + if (targets.empty()) { + if (deferredTargets.empty()) { + return false; + } - // swap targets & deferredTargets lists - std::swap(targets, deferredTargets); + std::swap(targets, deferredTargets); + } else { + // If the targets list is not empty then we have one targets + // from the deferredTargets list to the targets list. A new + // request will then service the targets list. + targets.splice(targets.end(), deferredTargets); + targets.populateFlags(); + } // clear deferredTargets flags deferredTargets.resetFlags(); diff --git a/src/mem/cache/mshr.hh b/src/mem/cache/mshr.hh index 437f8d4e4..1f59607bf 100644 --- a/src/mem/cache/mshr.hh +++ b/src/mem/cache/mshr.hh @@ -126,8 +126,24 @@ class MSHR : public QueueEntry, public Printable const Counter order; //!< Global order (for memory consistency mgmt) const PacketPtr pkt; //!< Pending request packet. const Source source; //!< Request from cpu, memory, or prefetcher? - const bool markedPending; //!< Did we mark upstream MSHR - //!< as downstreamPending? + + /** + * We use this flag to track whether we have cleared the + * downstreamPending flag for the MSHR of the cache above + * where this packet originates from and guard noninitial + * attempts to clear it. + * + * The flag markedPending needs to be updated when the + * TargetList is in service which can be: + * 1) during the Target instantiation if the MSHR is in + * service and the target is not deferred, + * 2) when the MSHR becomes in service if the target is not + * deferred, + * 3) or when the TargetList is promoted (deferredTargets -> + * targets). + */ + bool markedPending; + const bool allocOnFill; //!< Should the response servicing this //!< target list allocate in the cache? @@ -297,6 +313,20 @@ class MSHR : public QueueEntry, public Printable { return targets.size() + deferredTargets.size(); } /** + * Extracts the subset of the targets that can be serviced given a + * received response. This function returns the targets list + * unless the response is a ReadRespWithInvalidate. The + * ReadRespWithInvalidate is only invalidating response that its + * invalidation was not expected when the request (a + * ReadSharedReq) was sent out. For ReadRespWithInvalidate we can + * safely service only the first FromCPU target and all FromSnoop + * targets (inform all snoopers that we no longer have the block). + * + * @param pkt The response from the downstream memory + */ + TargetList extractServiceableTargets(PacketPtr pkt); + + /** * Returns true if there are targets left. * @return true if there are targets */ |