summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--src/mem/cache/cache.cc29
-rw-r--r--src/mem/cache/cache.hh7
-rw-r--r--src/mem/coherent_xbar.cc11
-rw-r--r--src/mem/coherent_xbar.hh7
-rw-r--r--src/mem/dram_ctrl.cc10
-rw-r--r--src/mem/dram_ctrl.hh8
-rw-r--r--src/mem/dramsim2.cc13
-rw-r--r--src/mem/dramsim2.hh8
-rw-r--r--src/mem/simple_mem.cc10
-rw-r--r--src/mem/simple_mem.hh8
-rw-r--r--src/mem/tport.cc12
-rw-r--r--src/mem/tport.hh8
12 files changed, 43 insertions, 88 deletions
diff --git a/src/mem/cache/cache.cc b/src/mem/cache/cache.cc
index 3e5ed42bc..aa95d5604 100644
--- a/src/mem/cache/cache.cc
+++ b/src/mem/cache/cache.cc
@@ -542,15 +542,6 @@ bool
Cache::recvTimingReq(PacketPtr pkt)
{
DPRINTF(CacheTags, "%s tags: %s\n", __func__, tags->print());
-//@todo Add back in MemDebug Calls
-// MemDebug::cacheAccess(pkt);
-
-
- /// @todo temporary hack to deal with memory corruption issue until
- /// 4-phase transactions are complete
- for (int x = 0; x < pendingDelete.size(); x++)
- delete pendingDelete[x];
- pendingDelete.clear();
assert(pkt->isRequest());
@@ -602,10 +593,9 @@ Cache::recvTimingReq(PacketPtr pkt)
// main memory will delete the packet
}
- /// @todo nominally we should just delete the packet here,
- /// however, until 4-phase stuff we can't because sending
- /// cache is still relying on it.
- pendingDelete.push_back(pkt);
+ // queue for deletion, as the sending cache is still relying
+ // on the packet
+ pendingDelete.reset(pkt);
// no need to take any action in this particular cache as the
// caches along the path to memory are allowed to keep lines
@@ -678,12 +668,11 @@ Cache::recvTimingReq(PacketPtr pkt)
// by access(), that calls accessBlock() function.
cpuSidePort->schedTimingResp(pkt, request_time);
} else {
- /// @todo nominally we should just delete the packet here,
- /// however, until 4-phase stuff we can't because sending cache is
- /// still relying on it. If the block is found in access(),
- /// CleanEvict and Writeback messages will be deleted here as
- /// well.
- pendingDelete.push_back(pkt);
+ // queue the packet for deletion, as the sending cache is
+ // still relying on it; if the block is found in access(),
+ // CleanEvict and Writeback messages will be deleted
+ // here as well
+ pendingDelete.reset(pkt);
}
} else {
// miss
@@ -754,7 +743,7 @@ Cache::recvTimingReq(PacketPtr pkt)
// CleanEvicts corresponding to blocks which have outstanding
// requests in MSHRs can be deleted here.
if (pkt->cmd == MemCmd::CleanEvict) {
- pendingDelete.push_back(pkt);
+ pendingDelete.reset(pkt);
} else {
DPRINTF(Cache, "%s coalescing MSHR for %s addr %#llx size %d\n",
__func__, pkt->cmdString(), pkt->getAddr(),
diff --git a/src/mem/cache/cache.hh b/src/mem/cache/cache.hh
index ec436201b..ae9e7e694 100644
--- a/src/mem/cache/cache.hh
+++ b/src/mem/cache/cache.hh
@@ -195,11 +195,10 @@ class Cache : public BaseCache
const bool prefetchOnAccess;
/**
- * @todo this is a temporary workaround until the 4-phase code is committed.
- * upstream caches need this packet until true is returned, so hold it for
- * deletion until a subsequent call
+ * Upstream caches need this packet until true is returned, so
+ * hold it for deletion until a subsequent call
*/
- std::vector<PacketPtr> pendingDelete;
+ std::unique_ptr<Packet> pendingDelete;
/**
* Does all the processing necessary to perform the provided request.
diff --git a/src/mem/coherent_xbar.cc b/src/mem/coherent_xbar.cc
index 6a0136ea8..223ab6ab5 100644
--- a/src/mem/coherent_xbar.cc
+++ b/src/mem/coherent_xbar.cc
@@ -140,12 +140,6 @@ CoherentXBar::init()
bool
CoherentXBar::recvTimingReq(PacketPtr pkt, PortID slave_port_id)
{
- // @todo temporary hack to deal with memory corruption issue until
- // 4-phase transactions are complete
- for (int x = 0; x < pendingDelete.size(); x++)
- delete pendingDelete[x];
- pendingDelete.clear();
-
// determine the source port based on the id
SlavePort *src_port = slavePorts[slave_port_id];
@@ -223,7 +217,10 @@ CoherentXBar::recvTimingReq(PacketPtr pkt, PortID slave_port_id)
// update the layer state and schedule an idle event
reqLayers[master_port_id]->succeededTiming(packetFinishTime);
- pendingDelete.push_back(pkt);
+
+ // queue the packet for deletion
+ pendingDelete.reset(pkt);
+
return true;
}
diff --git a/src/mem/coherent_xbar.hh b/src/mem/coherent_xbar.hh
index e99e9374f..24d00628b 100644
--- a/src/mem/coherent_xbar.hh
+++ b/src/mem/coherent_xbar.hh
@@ -274,11 +274,10 @@ class CoherentXBar : public BaseXBar
const Cycles snoopResponseLatency;
/**
- * @todo this is a temporary workaround until the 4-phase code is committed.
- * upstream caches need this packet until true is returned, so hold it for
- * deletion until a subsequent call
+ * Upstream caches need this packet until true is returned, so
+ * hold it for deletion until a subsequent call
*/
- std::vector<PacketPtr> pendingDelete;
+ std::unique_ptr<Packet> pendingDelete;
/** Function called by the port when the crossbar is recieving a Timing
request packet.*/
diff --git a/src/mem/dram_ctrl.cc b/src/mem/dram_ctrl.cc
index 3ba4616f7..4bd83f761 100644
--- a/src/mem/dram_ctrl.cc
+++ b/src/mem/dram_ctrl.cc
@@ -586,12 +586,6 @@ DRAMCtrl::printQs() const {
bool
DRAMCtrl::recvTimingReq(PacketPtr pkt)
{
- /// @todo temporary hack to deal with memory corruption issues until
- /// 4-phase transactions are complete
- for (int x = 0; x < pendingDelete.size(); x++)
- delete pendingDelete[x];
- pendingDelete.clear();
-
// This is where we enter from the outside world
DPRINTF(DRAM, "recvTimingReq: request %s addr %lld size %d\n",
pkt->cmdString(), pkt->getAddr(), pkt->getSize());
@@ -600,7 +594,7 @@ DRAMCtrl::recvTimingReq(PacketPtr pkt)
if (pkt->memInhibitAsserted() ||
pkt->cmd == MemCmd::CleanEvict) {
DPRINTF(DRAM, "Inhibited packet or clean evict -- Dropping it now\n");
- pendingDelete.push_back(pkt);
+ pendingDelete.reset(pkt);
return true;
}
@@ -872,7 +866,7 @@ DRAMCtrl::accessAndRespond(PacketPtr pkt, Tick static_latency)
} else {
// @todo the packet is going to be deleted, and the DRAMPacket
// is still having a pointer to it
- pendingDelete.push_back(pkt);
+ pendingDelete.reset(pkt);
}
DPRINTF(DRAM, "Done\n");
diff --git a/src/mem/dram_ctrl.hh b/src/mem/dram_ctrl.hh
index 617c94914..6cd72b266 100644
--- a/src/mem/dram_ctrl.hh
+++ b/src/mem/dram_ctrl.hh
@@ -836,11 +836,11 @@ class DRAMCtrl : public AbstractMemory
// timestamp offset
uint64_t timeStampOffset;
- /** @todo this is a temporary workaround until the 4-phase code is
- * committed. upstream caches needs this packet until true is returned, so
- * hold onto it for deletion until a subsequent call
+ /**
+ * Upstream caches need this packet until true is returned, so
+ * hold it for deletion until a subsequent call
*/
- std::vector<PacketPtr> pendingDelete;
+ std::unique_ptr<Packet> pendingDelete;
/**
* This function increments the energy when called. If stats are
diff --git a/src/mem/dramsim2.cc b/src/mem/dramsim2.cc
index 64acc5b57..cd0f45b23 100644
--- a/src/mem/dramsim2.cc
+++ b/src/mem/dramsim2.cc
@@ -178,16 +178,10 @@ DRAMSim2::recvTimingReq(PacketPtr pkt)
// we should never see a new request while in retry
assert(!retryReq);
- // @todo temporary hack to deal with memory corruption issues until
- // 4-phase transactions are complete
- for (int x = 0; x < pendingDelete.size(); x++)
- delete pendingDelete[x];
- pendingDelete.clear();
-
if (pkt->memInhibitAsserted()) {
// snooper will supply based on copy of packet
// still target's responsibility to delete packet
- pendingDelete.push_back(pkt);
+ pendingDelete.reset(pkt);
return true;
}
@@ -281,9 +275,8 @@ DRAMSim2::accessAndRespond(PacketPtr pkt)
if (!retryResp && !sendResponseEvent.scheduled())
schedule(sendResponseEvent, time);
} else {
- // @todo the packet is going to be deleted, and the DRAMPacket
- // is still having a pointer to it
- pendingDelete.push_back(pkt);
+ // queue the packet for deletion
+ pendingDelete.reset(pkt);
}
}
diff --git a/src/mem/dramsim2.hh b/src/mem/dramsim2.hh
index e57479247..5cde19cd8 100644
--- a/src/mem/dramsim2.hh
+++ b/src/mem/dramsim2.hh
@@ -160,11 +160,11 @@ class DRAMSim2 : public AbstractMemory
*/
EventWrapper<DRAMSim2, &DRAMSim2::tick> tickEvent;
- /** @todo this is a temporary workaround until the 4-phase code is
- * committed. upstream caches needs this packet until true is returned, so
- * hold onto it for deletion until a subsequent call
+ /**
+ * Upstream caches need this packet until true is returned, so
+ * hold it for deletion until a subsequent call
*/
- std::vector<PacketPtr> pendingDelete;
+ std::unique_ptr<Packet> pendingDelete;
public:
diff --git a/src/mem/simple_mem.cc b/src/mem/simple_mem.cc
index f68066e75..7e350feb6 100644
--- a/src/mem/simple_mem.cc
+++ b/src/mem/simple_mem.cc
@@ -97,16 +97,10 @@ SimpleMemory::recvFunctional(PacketPtr pkt)
bool
SimpleMemory::recvTimingReq(PacketPtr pkt)
{
- /// @todo temporary hack to deal with memory corruption issues until
- /// 4-phase transactions are complete
- for (int x = 0; x < pendingDelete.size(); x++)
- delete pendingDelete[x];
- pendingDelete.clear();
-
if (pkt->memInhibitAsserted()) {
// snooper will supply based on copy of packet
// still target's responsibility to delete packet
- pendingDelete.push_back(pkt);
+ pendingDelete.reset(pkt);
return true;
}
@@ -165,7 +159,7 @@ SimpleMemory::recvTimingReq(PacketPtr pkt)
if (!retryResp && !dequeueEvent.scheduled())
schedule(dequeueEvent, packetQueue.back().tick);
} else {
- pendingDelete.push_back(pkt);
+ pendingDelete.reset(pkt);
}
return true;
diff --git a/src/mem/simple_mem.hh b/src/mem/simple_mem.hh
index 35d8aeafb..d19de7608 100644
--- a/src/mem/simple_mem.hh
+++ b/src/mem/simple_mem.hh
@@ -175,11 +175,11 @@ class SimpleMemory : public AbstractMemory
*/
Tick getLatency() const;
- /** @todo this is a temporary workaround until the 4-phase code is
- * committed. upstream caches needs this packet until true is returned, so
- * hold onto it for deletion until a subsequent call
+ /**
+ * Upstream caches need this packet until true is returned, so
+ * hold it for deletion until a subsequent call
*/
- std::vector<PacketPtr> pendingDelete;
+ std::unique_ptr<Packet> pendingDelete;
public:
diff --git a/src/mem/tport.cc b/src/mem/tport.cc
index aa783ada0..9f9403a22 100644
--- a/src/mem/tport.cc
+++ b/src/mem/tport.cc
@@ -62,12 +62,6 @@ SimpleTimingPort::recvFunctional(PacketPtr pkt)
bool
SimpleTimingPort::recvTimingReq(PacketPtr pkt)
{
- /// @todo temporary hack to deal with memory corruption issue until
- /// 4-phase transactions are complete. Remove me later
- for (int x = 0; x < pendingDelete.size(); x++)
- delete pendingDelete[x];
- pendingDelete.clear();
-
// the SimpleTimingPort should not be used anywhere where there is
// a need to deal with inhibited packets
if (pkt->memInhibitAsserted())
@@ -82,10 +76,8 @@ SimpleTimingPort::recvTimingReq(PacketPtr pkt)
assert(pkt->isResponse());
schedTimingResp(pkt, curTick() + latency);
} else {
- /// @todo nominally we should just delete the packet here.
- /// Until 4-phase stuff we can't because the sending
- /// cache is still relying on it
- pendingDelete.push_back(pkt);
+ // queue the packet for deletion
+ pendingDelete.reset(pkt);
}
return true;
diff --git a/src/mem/tport.hh b/src/mem/tport.hh
index 166a23125..d7e4bbc74 100644
--- a/src/mem/tport.hh
+++ b/src/mem/tport.hh
@@ -81,12 +81,10 @@ class SimpleTimingPort : public QueuedSlavePort
virtual Tick recvAtomic(PacketPtr pkt) = 0;
/**
- * @todo this is a temporary workaround until the 4-phase code is committed.
- * upstream caches need this packet until true is returned, so hold it for
- * deletion until a subsequent call
+ * Upstream caches need this packet until true is returned, so
+ * hold it for deletion until a subsequent call
*/
- std::vector<PacketPtr> pendingDelete;
-
+ std::unique_ptr<Packet> pendingDelete;
public: