diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'ext/googlemock/test/gmock-nice-strict_test.cc')
-rw-r--r-- | ext/googlemock/test/gmock-nice-strict_test.cc | 424 |
1 files changed, 424 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/ext/googlemock/test/gmock-nice-strict_test.cc b/ext/googlemock/test/gmock-nice-strict_test.cc new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d0adcbbed --- /dev/null +++ b/ext/googlemock/test/gmock-nice-strict_test.cc @@ -0,0 +1,424 @@ +// Copyright 2008, Google Inc. +// All rights reserved. +// +// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without +// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are +// met: +// +// * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright +// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. +// * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above +// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer +// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the +// distribution. +// * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its +// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from +// this software without specific prior written permission. +// +// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS +// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT +// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR +// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT +// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, +// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT +// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, +// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY +// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT +// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE +// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. +// +// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan) + +#include "gmock/gmock-generated-nice-strict.h" + +#include <string> +#include "gmock/gmock.h" +#include "gtest/gtest.h" +#include "gtest/gtest-spi.h" + +// This must not be defined inside the ::testing namespace, or it will +// clash with ::testing::Mock. +class Mock { + public: + Mock() {} + + MOCK_METHOD0(DoThis, void()); + + private: + GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(Mock); +}; + +namespace testing { +namespace gmock_nice_strict_test { + +using testing::internal::string; +using testing::GMOCK_FLAG(verbose); +using testing::HasSubstr; +using testing::NaggyMock; +using testing::NiceMock; +using testing::StrictMock; + +#if GTEST_HAS_STREAM_REDIRECTION +using testing::internal::CaptureStdout; +using testing::internal::GetCapturedStdout; +#endif + +// Defines some mock classes needed by the tests. + +class Foo { + public: + virtual ~Foo() {} + + virtual void DoThis() = 0; + virtual int DoThat(bool flag) = 0; +}; + +class MockFoo : public Foo { + public: + MockFoo() {} + void Delete() { delete this; } + + MOCK_METHOD0(DoThis, void()); + MOCK_METHOD1(DoThat, int(bool flag)); + + private: + GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(MockFoo); +}; + +class MockBar { + public: + explicit MockBar(const string& s) : str_(s) {} + + MockBar(char a1, char a2, string a3, string a4, int a5, int a6, + const string& a7, const string& a8, bool a9, bool a10) { + str_ = string() + a1 + a2 + a3 + a4 + static_cast<char>(a5) + + static_cast<char>(a6) + a7 + a8 + (a9 ? 'T' : 'F') + (a10 ? 'T' : 'F'); + } + + virtual ~MockBar() {} + + const string& str() const { return str_; } + + MOCK_METHOD0(This, int()); + MOCK_METHOD2(That, string(int, bool)); + + private: + string str_; + + GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(MockBar); +}; + +#if GTEST_HAS_STREAM_REDIRECTION + +// Tests that a raw mock generates warnings for uninteresting calls. +TEST(RawMockTest, WarningForUninterestingCall) { + const string saved_flag = GMOCK_FLAG(verbose); + GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = "warning"; + + MockFoo raw_foo; + + CaptureStdout(); + raw_foo.DoThis(); + raw_foo.DoThat(true); + EXPECT_THAT(GetCapturedStdout(), + HasSubstr("Uninteresting mock function call")); + + GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = saved_flag; +} + +// Tests that a raw mock generates warnings for uninteresting calls +// that delete the mock object. +TEST(RawMockTest, WarningForUninterestingCallAfterDeath) { + const string saved_flag = GMOCK_FLAG(verbose); + GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = "warning"; + + MockFoo* const raw_foo = new MockFoo; + + ON_CALL(*raw_foo, DoThis()) + .WillByDefault(Invoke(raw_foo, &MockFoo::Delete)); + + CaptureStdout(); + raw_foo->DoThis(); + EXPECT_THAT(GetCapturedStdout(), + HasSubstr("Uninteresting mock function call")); + + GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = saved_flag; +} + +// Tests that a raw mock generates informational logs for +// uninteresting calls. +TEST(RawMockTest, InfoForUninterestingCall) { + MockFoo raw_foo; + + const string saved_flag = GMOCK_FLAG(verbose); + GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = "info"; + CaptureStdout(); + raw_foo.DoThis(); + EXPECT_THAT(GetCapturedStdout(), + HasSubstr("Uninteresting mock function call")); + + GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = saved_flag; +} + +// Tests that a nice mock generates no warning for uninteresting calls. +TEST(NiceMockTest, NoWarningForUninterestingCall) { + NiceMock<MockFoo> nice_foo; + + CaptureStdout(); + nice_foo.DoThis(); + nice_foo.DoThat(true); + EXPECT_EQ("", GetCapturedStdout()); +} + +// Tests that a nice mock generates no warning for uninteresting calls +// that delete the mock object. +TEST(NiceMockTest, NoWarningForUninterestingCallAfterDeath) { + NiceMock<MockFoo>* const nice_foo = new NiceMock<MockFoo>; + + ON_CALL(*nice_foo, DoThis()) + .WillByDefault(Invoke(nice_foo, &MockFoo::Delete)); + + CaptureStdout(); + nice_foo->DoThis(); + EXPECT_EQ("", GetCapturedStdout()); +} + +// Tests that a nice mock generates informational logs for +// uninteresting calls. +TEST(NiceMockTest, InfoForUninterestingCall) { + NiceMock<MockFoo> nice_foo; + + const string saved_flag = GMOCK_FLAG(verbose); + GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = "info"; + CaptureStdout(); + nice_foo.DoThis(); + EXPECT_THAT(GetCapturedStdout(), + HasSubstr("Uninteresting mock function call")); + + GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = saved_flag; +} + +#endif // GTEST_HAS_STREAM_REDIRECTION + +// Tests that a nice mock allows expected calls. +TEST(NiceMockTest, AllowsExpectedCall) { + NiceMock<MockFoo> nice_foo; + + EXPECT_CALL(nice_foo, DoThis()); + nice_foo.DoThis(); +} + +// Tests that an unexpected call on a nice mock fails. +TEST(NiceMockTest, UnexpectedCallFails) { + NiceMock<MockFoo> nice_foo; + + EXPECT_CALL(nice_foo, DoThis()).Times(0); + EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(nice_foo.DoThis(), "called more times than expected"); +} + +// Tests that NiceMock works with a mock class that has a non-default +// constructor. +TEST(NiceMockTest, NonDefaultConstructor) { + NiceMock<MockBar> nice_bar("hi"); + EXPECT_EQ("hi", nice_bar.str()); + + nice_bar.This(); + nice_bar.That(5, true); +} + +// Tests that NiceMock works with a mock class that has a 10-ary +// non-default constructor. +TEST(NiceMockTest, NonDefaultConstructor10) { + NiceMock<MockBar> nice_bar('a', 'b', "c", "d", 'e', 'f', + "g", "h", true, false); + EXPECT_EQ("abcdefghTF", nice_bar.str()); + + nice_bar.This(); + nice_bar.That(5, true); +} + +#if !GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE +// Tests that NiceMock<Mock> compiles where Mock is a user-defined +// class (as opposed to ::testing::Mock). We had to work around an +// MSVC 8.0 bug that caused the symbol Mock used in the definition of +// NiceMock to be looked up in the wrong context, and this test +// ensures that our fix works. +// +// We have to skip this test on Symbian and Windows Mobile, as it +// causes the program to crash there, for reasons unclear to us yet. +TEST(NiceMockTest, AcceptsClassNamedMock) { + NiceMock< ::Mock> nice; + EXPECT_CALL(nice, DoThis()); + nice.DoThis(); +} +#endif // !GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE + +#if GTEST_HAS_STREAM_REDIRECTION + +// Tests that a naggy mock generates warnings for uninteresting calls. +TEST(NaggyMockTest, WarningForUninterestingCall) { + const string saved_flag = GMOCK_FLAG(verbose); + GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = "warning"; + + NaggyMock<MockFoo> naggy_foo; + + CaptureStdout(); + naggy_foo.DoThis(); + naggy_foo.DoThat(true); + EXPECT_THAT(GetCapturedStdout(), + HasSubstr("Uninteresting mock function call")); + + GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = saved_flag; +} + +// Tests that a naggy mock generates a warning for an uninteresting call +// that deletes the mock object. +TEST(NaggyMockTest, WarningForUninterestingCallAfterDeath) { + const string saved_flag = GMOCK_FLAG(verbose); + GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = "warning"; + + NaggyMock<MockFoo>* const naggy_foo = new NaggyMock<MockFoo>; + + ON_CALL(*naggy_foo, DoThis()) + .WillByDefault(Invoke(naggy_foo, &MockFoo::Delete)); + + CaptureStdout(); + naggy_foo->DoThis(); + EXPECT_THAT(GetCapturedStdout(), + HasSubstr("Uninteresting mock function call")); + + GMOCK_FLAG(verbose) = saved_flag; +} + +#endif // GTEST_HAS_STREAM_REDIRECTION + +// Tests that a naggy mock allows expected calls. +TEST(NaggyMockTest, AllowsExpectedCall) { + NaggyMock<MockFoo> naggy_foo; + + EXPECT_CALL(naggy_foo, DoThis()); + naggy_foo.DoThis(); +} + +// Tests that an unexpected call on a naggy mock fails. +TEST(NaggyMockTest, UnexpectedCallFails) { + NaggyMock<MockFoo> naggy_foo; + + EXPECT_CALL(naggy_foo, DoThis()).Times(0); + EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(naggy_foo.DoThis(), + "called more times than expected"); +} + +// Tests that NaggyMock works with a mock class that has a non-default +// constructor. +TEST(NaggyMockTest, NonDefaultConstructor) { + NaggyMock<MockBar> naggy_bar("hi"); + EXPECT_EQ("hi", naggy_bar.str()); + + naggy_bar.This(); + naggy_bar.That(5, true); +} + +// Tests that NaggyMock works with a mock class that has a 10-ary +// non-default constructor. +TEST(NaggyMockTest, NonDefaultConstructor10) { + NaggyMock<MockBar> naggy_bar('0', '1', "2", "3", '4', '5', + "6", "7", true, false); + EXPECT_EQ("01234567TF", naggy_bar.str()); + + naggy_bar.This(); + naggy_bar.That(5, true); +} + +#if !GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE +// Tests that NaggyMock<Mock> compiles where Mock is a user-defined +// class (as opposed to ::testing::Mock). We had to work around an +// MSVC 8.0 bug that caused the symbol Mock used in the definition of +// NaggyMock to be looked up in the wrong context, and this test +// ensures that our fix works. +// +// We have to skip this test on Symbian and Windows Mobile, as it +// causes the program to crash there, for reasons unclear to us yet. +TEST(NaggyMockTest, AcceptsClassNamedMock) { + NaggyMock< ::Mock> naggy; + EXPECT_CALL(naggy, DoThis()); + naggy.DoThis(); +} +#endif // !GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE + +// Tests that a strict mock allows expected calls. +TEST(StrictMockTest, AllowsExpectedCall) { + StrictMock<MockFoo> strict_foo; + + EXPECT_CALL(strict_foo, DoThis()); + strict_foo.DoThis(); +} + +// Tests that an unexpected call on a strict mock fails. +TEST(StrictMockTest, UnexpectedCallFails) { + StrictMock<MockFoo> strict_foo; + + EXPECT_CALL(strict_foo, DoThis()).Times(0); + EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(strict_foo.DoThis(), + "called more times than expected"); +} + +// Tests that an uninteresting call on a strict mock fails. +TEST(StrictMockTest, UninterestingCallFails) { + StrictMock<MockFoo> strict_foo; + + EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(strict_foo.DoThis(), + "Uninteresting mock function call"); +} + +// Tests that an uninteresting call on a strict mock fails, even if +// the call deletes the mock object. +TEST(StrictMockTest, UninterestingCallFailsAfterDeath) { + StrictMock<MockFoo>* const strict_foo = new StrictMock<MockFoo>; + + ON_CALL(*strict_foo, DoThis()) + .WillByDefault(Invoke(strict_foo, &MockFoo::Delete)); + + EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(strict_foo->DoThis(), + "Uninteresting mock function call"); +} + +// Tests that StrictMock works with a mock class that has a +// non-default constructor. +TEST(StrictMockTest, NonDefaultConstructor) { + StrictMock<MockBar> strict_bar("hi"); + EXPECT_EQ("hi", strict_bar.str()); + + EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(strict_bar.That(5, true), + "Uninteresting mock function call"); +} + +// Tests that StrictMock works with a mock class that has a 10-ary +// non-default constructor. +TEST(StrictMockTest, NonDefaultConstructor10) { + StrictMock<MockBar> strict_bar('a', 'b', "c", "d", 'e', 'f', + "g", "h", true, false); + EXPECT_EQ("abcdefghTF", strict_bar.str()); + + EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(strict_bar.That(5, true), + "Uninteresting mock function call"); +} + +#if !GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE +// Tests that StrictMock<Mock> compiles where Mock is a user-defined +// class (as opposed to ::testing::Mock). We had to work around an +// MSVC 8.0 bug that caused the symbol Mock used in the definition of +// StrictMock to be looked up in the wrong context, and this test +// ensures that our fix works. +// +// We have to skip this test on Symbian and Windows Mobile, as it +// causes the program to crash there, for reasons unclear to us yet. +TEST(StrictMockTest, AcceptsClassNamedMock) { + StrictMock< ::Mock> strict; + EXPECT_CALL(strict, DoThis()); + strict.DoThis(); +} +#endif // !GTEST_OS_SYMBIAN && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MOBILE + +} // namespace gmock_nice_strict_test +} // namespace testing |