| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
These no longer cause any of the tests to break, so there's no reason
to filter them out.
Change-Id: I9c0b25fc42eb3060ac7d6d6a46ded130227c302d
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13396
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
This gets rid of one of the last instances of a warning about
unimplemented functionality.
Change-Id: I3d8e50ea45554cba969118ce873ed3d2b041ec43
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13395
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
This class doesn't really add anything, but it provides a consistent
base class for sc_modules vs. generic sc_objects.
Change-Id: I3fbd4f6b5d1be0b5419f5cbd304aec61d404a341
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13355
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
The scheduler is an internal detail and shouldn't be exposed to the
headers in ext. It would transitively include more headers which are
not in ext, making it not self contained.
Change-Id: I8384cde9d19363953ffd0c91e7d8d27f8f79a570
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13336
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
This is to avoid having to expose the scheduler (which tracks the
current process) to header files which should be independent of gem5
and the underlying implementation.
Change-Id: I1b0810ab66c3ce52b5b94236d7df86da66a62472
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13335
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I8e12713c49aad03d0bfb779883adcbfa8fd4b42e
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13334
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Reads shouldn't free up space until an update happens.
Change-Id: I18e1601c27b44643f103c86f04b1fa2c23baf1e8
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13333
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Ieaca025786d70c0d851eec9d1eb9f7f01b513cde
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13332
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Create and use predefined messages for datatypes which match the ones
Accellera uses.
Change-Id: I92dd52f62462b864264217bb81f3ff1dcec020bf
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13331
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Create and use predefined messages for channels which match the ones
Accellera uses.
Change-Id: I179214838bbd83604e50225926cdc6b5b1b16923
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13330
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
STL containers may need to be constructed before they're used. Don't
count on being able to insert into them during a static initializer.
Change-Id: Icb05d5084a470e1ebd976ae6e1954b1a78aabd6a
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13329
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Create and use predefined messages for utils which match the ones
Accellera uses.
Change-Id: I932b7206fc16181d01a0d5b7441ce617b30e5365
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13328
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
If the check doesn't abort the port binding in progress, it will be
reported twice.
Change-Id: I691ebd0f1598193f861c6085341dcd2fb05dd210
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13327
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Ie7d704547bb8523a3c44479a89d2af4fcce6e8b6
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13326
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I073eb16cbeb892f24ac3860daca056ed2fb09086
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13325
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
This test expects to exit with an error.
Change-Id: Id0b1ae4967ad0b8a356c7a04ed5fe9eb2f3c6641
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13324
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Create and use predefined messages for core which match the ones
Accellera uses.
Change-Id: I05b1398933f753946d5917f39d0f39c7cb45ed9f
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13323
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
These ids are the ones the Accellera implementation/tests use. Some of
the tests expect them to be available and usable.
Change-Id: I4e4dc3470c28d4113330a44ccd06ffe7724e75b1
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13322
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I7cc3e571a7a63eed383ad7f897342a539318f961
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13321
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
This is in contrast to how Accellera actually implements it, implying
they would fail their own test.
The specific difference is that suppress_id should only suppress
SC_INFO and SC_WARNING, not all severity levels like the Accellera
implementation will do.
Change-Id: I34f0d2d5912548963433a785cfa6ef88ad818042
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13320
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
This is actually not consistent with how it was handled in 2.0.1 which
is supposedly what this is supposed to be backwards compatible with,
in that in the earlier version on info and warning messages were
suppressed. This is exposed by one of the tests,
utils/sc_report/test01, which suppresses an integer ID and then reports
an error with it. The "golden" output shows the message supressed, but
the actual implementation makes no such distinction.
This implementation duplicates Accelleras for now, but a future change
will make it consistent with the old implementation so the test will
pass.
Change-Id: I8f959321151e2bb60b94000594f30531b80e2684
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13319
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
There's a deprecated reporting mechanism based on integer message ids,
and the reporting mechanism needs to be refactored a bit to make it
easier to support.
Some bookkeeping data structures were moved out to somewhere they
can be accessed by other code, obviating the non-standard get_handler
function.
Change-Id: Id427cd79be9ef0f3275fbac39ff047ab672fb3e0
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13318
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
These arguments were originally just to make sure arguments could be
successfully passed to sc_main, but serve no intrinsic purpose. There
are some tests which can accept command line arguments to customize
how they run, and having nonsense arguments confuses them and makes
them behave incorrectly.
Change-Id: Ib328edb12e01a97dca778bbf45b10e91dd8c07a6
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13317
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
When resetting a process which is ready pending coming out of suspend,
clear that state since the process is about to run in service of the
reset.
Change-Id: Iade3ec4b2f3eadd372cce456dca66850d37ed5fd
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13316
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
The golden reference output for the test was to throw an error which
is clearly not at all related to the test (it was about immediate
self notifications while the test never calls any form of notify())
and which would happen significantly before the end of the test,
negating all the other behaviors and checks which would happen after
that point.
Since it strongly looks like the reference output was updated in error,
and because other very similarly structured tests are expected to run
silently except for printing "Success" at the end (which it does when
run under gem5), this change manually updates the golden reference
output to reflect what appears to be correct.
Change-Id: I9cde81c28774049653d60f1ffd37a2fae875b522
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13315
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I9c8026cde455070841139d02955f5c083b9e0645
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13314
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I8c2b20525aa46955f4f2df34436b7424e706e410
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13313
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
For some reason lost to the sands of time, the throw_it function was
virtual for the Thread class, and that class would call the base
class's throw_it, and then also injectException itself. That would
result in the exception being injected into the thread twice which is
incorrect.
Since it's not clear what the original intention of this code was, the
throw_it function is now no longer virtual, and the one useful aspect
of it, a check if the process is already terminated, was moved into the
base class function.
Change-Id: I7fb14baa7728bd1e9206011870b6ccaa9c4e8c64
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13312
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
This seems to be a leftover from an earlier implementation.
Change-Id: I63d7e576fd3c11cf73769c34bbc97a4d3bbbdaeb
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13311
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: If5140bd86159e9257eb9e6ccb8301dd6349dacff
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13310
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
The internal events aren't supposed to show up in the namespace or as
children of objects.
Change-Id: Id04b9bfe2e1f8f216390dd989797558eaf33d715
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13309
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Iec3b10b0251a7a343b81540f524427e98031577a
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13308
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
If an exception escapes sc_main, Accellera catches it and feeds it
into the report handler, telling it to run the catch actions. This
seems like it sets up lots of dangerous scenarios, and also makes a
vital error detecting path more complex and error prone.
On the other hand, it makes one of the tests pass.
Change-Id: I7f9d07e01e63c7abeee903febe2e434041ec49a4
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13307
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
There is a test which checks what it was and asserts if it's something
else.
Change-Id: I114c0a38c9fa69544416a4d1b555bb87e6246efd
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13306
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
This can't override pending notifications like normal notify does.
Change-Id: Ie5f12a97ffdcc3dfca20fa7852f89687ee8bfca3
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13305
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I4e1ef90b14074e5a2794a4386e411397213b2789
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13304
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
The Accellera version reports an error if the period, high or low
portions of the clock are zero.
Change-Id: I2cbb7c3a1b6abe4d969ef875ebf8754d2d1c489a
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13303
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Accellera checks for a null pointer, and a test tries using that input.
Change-Id: I0f098f53de37ebbe481ea46e61fc0a9a404c29db
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13302
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
This way they don't try to detach themselves from a parent object which
no longer exists.
Change-Id: Id4a3f3b2241cf8c67cae9b983bd4c1acbef083e3
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13301
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Rather than assuming the port is bound, check and report an error.
Change-Id: I4af89d104bc6de9932ff044740446833732d01d9
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13300
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I585e34c4a666103af16ff1675701b61122822b55
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13299
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
These are used in one of the tests, specifically the comma operator. It
didn't cause compilation to fail because of the default meaning of the
comma.
Change-Id: I7ce7fe74f02d4ad6a4ab896a2f0d6bd1ce635c2f
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13298
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Positionally binding more than once (like with the deprecated comma or
<< operators) should pick up where it left off the last time instead
of starting again from the beginning.
Change-Id: Ifc33520d6ce40544bd0ad80a5657b1a38a7914e4
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13297
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Rather than just asserting some invariants are true, report errors if
they aren't.
Change-Id: Id361b8a13011e1a75289ddddb6b41c1d09dbf794
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13296
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
This is sort of pointless, except that it matches Accellera's behavior.
Change-Id: Ia63f2de998157aa68ce36fdc2ba39ca7a80fecbe
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13295
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
The previous implementation used the value changed event to track when
signals changed value, but there were a couple problems with this
approach. First, this piggybacked on the sensitivity mechanism in some
ways, but diverged in others. The sensitivity didn't notify a process
when it was satisfied like other sensitivity types would, and it also
ignored whether the process was disabled.
Second, the value_changed_event is notified by a signal instance as a
delta notification, but reset signals are supposed to act immediately.
That means they should happen before all delta notifications, or in
other words all delta notifications should see the reset status of a
given process. That's particularly important in the case of wait(int n)
where setting the reset clears the reset count, and the count is
checked when determining whether or not to wake up a process when its
sensitivity is satisfied, potentially by a delta notification.
Third, by removing the middle man and not trying to repurpose the
sensitivity mechanism, the code gets simpler and easier to understand.
Change-Id: I0d05d11437291d368b060f6a45a207813615f113
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13294
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
It appears that events which are triggered during the timing phase
are considered triggered in the following evaluation phase. The
"triggered()" function on events is non-standard and not really
explained anywhere, but this appears to work in practice.
Change-Id: I2574dc4569bf148c55fbe2a4873d458fc507f2a5
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13293
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
This class is supposed to be a more efficient way to manage small bits
of memory. At least for now, new and delete will do the same job
functionally. Also, the heap manager may be just as efficient as
whatever custom mechanism sc_mempool would use.
Change-Id: I6fdc01a69ca017d94b14a15a196ad29b66ef9858
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13292
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
The standard says that there are namespaces for each module, and
one global namespace. Accellera also has namespaces for each process,
which shows up in the test output.
Change-Id: I4c8c5cecd5fb685d7bab521d9ae131aef23a6ab4
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13291
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
These match error checks which are already in, for instance, the
sc_port constructor.
Change-Id: I8dfb4ce37bf0e59c6fa879f0afda5112af78b40b
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13290
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
