| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Clang has started(?) reporting override related warnings, something gcc
apparently did before, but was disabled in the SConstruct. Rather than
disable the warnings in for clang as well, this change fixes the
warnings. A future change will re-enable the warnings for gcc.
Change-Id: I3cc79e45749b2ae0f9bebb1acadc56a3d3a942da
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/9343
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
In the ISA instruction definitions, some classes were declared with
execute, etc., functions outside of the main template because they
had CPU specific signatures and would need to be duplicated with
each CPU plugged into them. Now that the instructions always just
use an ExecContext, there's no reason for those templates to be
separate. This change folds those templates together.
Change-Id: I13bda247d3d1cc07c0ea06968e48aa5b4aace7fa
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/5401
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Alec Roelke <ar4jc@virginia.edu>
Maintainer: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
|
|
With (upcoming) separate compilation, they are useless. Only
link-time optimization could re-inline them, but ideally
feedback-directed optimization would choose to do so only for
profitable (i.e. common) instructions.
|
|
|
|
|
