Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
codes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
into a format.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This simplifies the decoder slightly, and makes the system call mechanism
very slightly more realistic.
|
|
These fixes were provided by Ali and fix the saturation condition code and
various multiply instructions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This change moves the writeback of load multiple instructions to the beginning
of the macroop. That way, the MicroLdrRetUop that changes the mode will
necessarily happen later, ensuring the writeback happens in the original mode.
The actual value in the base register if it also shows up in the register list
is undefined, so it's fine if it gets clobbered by one of the loads. For
stores where the base register is the lowest numbered in the register list,
the original value should be written back. That means stores can't write back
at the beginning, but the mode changing problem doesn't affect them so they
can continue to write back at the end.
|
|
Instead of panic immediately when these instructions are executed, an
UndefinedInstruction fault is returned. In FS mode (not currently
implemented), this is the fault that should, to my knowledge, be triggered in
these situations and should be handled using the normal architected
mechanisms. In SE mode, the fault causes a panic when it's invoked that gives
the same information as the instruction did. When/if support for speculative
execution of ARM is supported, this will allow a mispeculated and unrecognized
and/or unimplemented instruction from causing a panic. Only once the
instruction is going to be committed will the fault be invoked, triggering the
panic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|