Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Packet::checkFunctional also wrote data to/from the packet depending
on if it was read/write, respectively, which the 'check' in the name
would suggest otherwise. This renames it to doFunctional, which is
more suggestive. It also renames any function called checkFunctional
which calls Packet::checkFunctional. These are
- Bridge::BridgeMasterPort::checkFunctional
- calls Packet::checkFunctional
- MSHR::checkFunctional
- calls Packet::checkFunctional
- MSHR::TargetList::checkFunctional
- calls Packet::checkFunctional
- Queue<>::checkFunctional
(of src/mem/cache/queue.hh, not src/cpu/minor/buffers.h)
- Instantiated with Queue<WriteQueueEntry> and Queue<MSHR>
- WriteQueueEntry
- calls Packet::checkFunctional
- WriteQueueEntry::TargetList
- calls Packet::checkFunctional
- MemDelay::checkFunctional
- calls QueuedSlavePort/QueuedMasterPort::checkFunctional
- Packet::checkFunctional
- PacketQueue::checkFunctional
- calls Packet::checkFunctional
- QueuedSlavePort::checkFunctional
- calls PacketQueue::doFunctional
- QueuedMasterPort::checkFunctional
- calls PacketQueue::doFunctional
- SerialLink::SerialLinkMasterPort::checkFunctional
- calls Packet::doFunctional
Change-Id: Ieca2579c020c329040da053ba8e25820801b62c5
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/11810
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I111b0f662897c43974aadb08da1ed85c7542585c
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/10433
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Maintainer: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
|
|
The class re-uses the existing MSHR and write queue. At the moment
every single access is handled by the cache, even uncacheable
accesses, and nothing is forwarded.
This is a modified version of a changeset put together by Andreas
Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com>
Change-Id: I41f7f9c2b8c7fa5ec23712a4446e8adb1c9a336a
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/8291
Maintainer: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
|
|
Change-Id: I5042410be54935650b7d05c84d8d9efbfcc06e70
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
|
|
The cache queue reserve is there as an overflow to give us enough
headroom based on when we block the cache, and how many transactions
we may already have accepted before actually blocking. The previous
values were probably chosen to be "big enough", when we actually know
that we check the MSHRs after every single allocation, and for the
write buffers we know that we implicitly may need one entry for every
outstanding MSHR.
* * *
mem: Adjust cache queue reserve to more conservative values
The cache queue reserve is there as an overflow to give us enough
headroom based on when we block the cache, and how many transactions
we may already have accepted before actually blocking. The previous
values were probably chosen to be "big enough", when we actually know
that we check the MSHRs after every single allocation, and for the
write buffers we know that we implicitly may need one entry for every
outstanding MSHR.
|
|
This patch breaks out the cache write buffer into a separate class,
without affecting any stats. The goal of the patch is to avoid
encumbering the much-simpler write queue with the complex MSHR
handling. In a follow on patch this simplification allows us to
implement write combining.
The WriteQueue gets its own class, but shares a common ancestor, the
generic Queue, with the MSHRQueue.
|