| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
This change adds new packet cmds and request flags for cache
maintenance operations.
1) A cache clean operation writes dirty data in the first memory below
the specified xbar and updates any old copies in the memories above
it.
2) A cache invalidate operation invalidates all copies of the
specified block in the memories above the specified xbar
3) A clean and invalidate operation is a combination of the two
operations above
Change-Id: If45702848bdd568de532cd57cba58499e5e4354c
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Curtis Dunham <curtis.dunham@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Anouk Van Laer <anouk.vanlaer@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/5047
Maintainer: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
|
|
Previously, WriteClean packets would always write to the first memory
below unless the memory was unable to allocate in which case it would
be forwarded further below.
This change adds support for specifying the destination of a
WriteClean packet. The cache annotates the request with the specified
destination and marks the packet as write-through upon its
creation. The coherent xbar checks packets for their destination and
resets the write-through flag when necessary e.g., the coherent xbar
that is set as the PoC will reset the write-through flag for packets
to the PoC.
Change-Id: I84b653f5cb6e46e97e09508649a3725d72d94606
Reviewed-by: Curtis Dunham <curtis.dunham@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Anouk Van Laer <anouk.vanlaer@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/5046
Maintainer: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
|
|
A WriteClean packet allows a cache to write a block to a memory below
without evicting its copy. A typical usecase for a WriteClean packet
is a cache clean operation.
Change-Id: If356cb067da5ddf3210c135f41ef0891fb811568
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Curtis Dunham <curtis.dunham@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Anouk Van Laer <anouk.vanlaer@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/5044
Maintainer: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
|
|
These files aren't a collection of miscellaneous stuff, they're the
definition of the Logger interface, and a few utility macros for
calling into that interface (panic, warn, etc.).
Change-Id: I84267ac3f45896a83c0ef027f8f19c5e9a5667d1
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/6226
Reviewed-by: Brandon Potter <Brandon.Potter@amd.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
|
|
Previously DPRINTFs printing information about a packet would use ad hoc
formats. This patch changes all DPRINTFs to use the print function
defined by the packet class, making the packet printing format more
uniform and easier to change.
Change-Id: Idd436a9758d4bf70c86a574d524648b2a2580970
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephan Diestelhorst <stephan.diestelhorst@arm.com>
|
|
This patch adds a FromCache attribute to the packet, and updates a
number of the existing request commands to reflect that the request
originates from a cache. The attribute simplifies checking if a
requests came from a cache or not, and this is used by both the cache
and snoop filter in follow-on patches.
Change-Id: Ib0a7a080bbe4d6036ddd84b46fd45bc7eb41cd8f
Reviewed-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Gutierrez <anthony.gutierrez@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Steve Reinhardt <stever@gmail.com>
|
|
This patch removes the NeedsWritable flag for all responses, as it is
really only the request that needs a writable response. The response,
on the other hand, should in these cases always provide the line in a
writable state, as indicated by the hasSharers flag not being set.
When we send requests that has NeedsWritable set, the response will
always have the hasSharers flag not set. Additionally, there are cases
where the request did not have NeedsWritable set, and we still get a
writable response with the hasSharers flag not set. This never happens
on snoops, but is used by downstream caches to pass ownership
upstream.
As part of this patch, the affected response types are updated, and
the snoop filter is similarly modified to check only the hasSharers
flag (as it should). A sanity check is also added to the packet class,
asserting that we never look at the NeedsWritable flag for responses.
No regressions are affected.
|
|
This patch changes the name of a bunch of packet flags and MSHR member
functions and variables to make the coherency protocol easier to
understand. In addition the patch adds and updates lots of
descriptions, explicitly spelling out assumptions.
The following name changes are made:
* the packet memInhibit flag is renamed to cacheResponding
* the packet sharedAsserted flag is renamed to hasSharers
* the packet NeedsExclusive attribute is renamed to NeedsWritable
* the packet isSupplyExclusive is renamed responderHadWritable
* the MSHR pendingDirty is renamed to pendingModified
The cache states, Modified, Owned, Exclusive, Shared are also called
out in the cache and MSHR code to make it easier to understand.
|
|
|
|
This patch adds the necessary commands and cache functionality to
allow clean writebacks. This functionality is crucial, especially when
having exclusive (victim) caches. For example, if read-only L1
instruction caches are not sending clean writebacks, there will never
be any spills from the L1 to the L2. At the moment the cache model
defaults to not sending clean writebacks, and this should possibly be
re-evaluated.
The implementation of clean writebacks relies on a new packet command
WritebackClean, which acts much like a Writeback (renamed
WritebackDirty), and also much like a CleanEvict. On eviction of a
clean block the cache either sends a clean evict, or a clean
writeback, and if any copies are still cached upstream the clean
evict/writeback is dropped. Similarly, if a clean evict/writeback
reaches a cache where there are outstanding MSHRs for the block, the
packet is dropped. In the typical case though, the clean writeback
allocates a block in the downstream cache, and marks it writable if
the evicted block was writable.
The patch changes the O3_ARM_v7a L1 cache configuration and the
default L1 caches in config/common/Caches.py
|
|
This patch changes the CleanEvict command type to not be considered a
write. Initially it was made a zero-sized write to match the writeback
command, but as things developed it became clear that it causes more
problems than it solves. For example, the memory modules (and bridge)
should not consider the CleanEvict as a write, but instead discard
it. With this patch it will be neither a read, nor write, and as it
does not need a response the slave will simply sink it.
|
|
This patch removes the extraneous flags and attributes from the
request and packet, and simply leaves the new commands. The change
introduced when adding acquire/release breaks all compatibility with
existing traces, and there is really no need for any new flags and
attributes. The commands should be sufficient.
This patch fixes packet tracing (urgent), and also removes the
unnecessary complexity.
|
|
Add support for acquire and release requests. These synchronization operations
are commonly supported by several modern instruction sets.
|
|
WriteInvalidateReq ensures that a whole-line write does not incur the
cost of first doing a read exclusive, only to later overwrite the
data. This patch splits the existing WriteInvalidateReq into a
WriteLineReq, which is done locally, and an InvalidateReq that is sent
out throughout the memory system. The WriteLineReq re-uses the normal
WriteResp.
The change allows us to better express the difference between the
cache that is performing the write, and the ones that are merely
invalidating. As a consequence, we no longer have to rely on the
isTopLevel flag. Moreover, the actual memory in the system does not
see the intitial write, only the writeback. We were marking the
written line as dirty already, so there is really no need to also push
the write all the way to the memory.
The overall flow of the write-invalidate operation remains the same,
i.e. the operation is only carried out once the response for the
invalidate comes back. This patch adds the InvalidateResp for this
very reason.
|
|
This patch adds two new read requests packets:
ReadCleanReq - For a cache to explicitly request clean data. The
response is thus exclusive or shared, but not owned or modified. The
read-only caches (see previous patch) use this request type to ensure
they do not get dirty data.
ReadSharedReq - We add this to distinguish cache read requests from
those issued by other masters, such as devices and CPUs. Thus, devices
use ReadReq, and caches use ReadCleanReq, ReadExReq, or
ReadSharedReq. For the latter, the response can be any state, shared,
exclusive, owned or even modified.
Both ReadCleanReq and ReadSharedReq re-use the normal ReadResp. The
two transactions are aligned with the emerging cache-coherent TLM
standard and the AMBA nomenclature.
With this change, the normal ReadReq should never be used by a cache,
and is reserved for the actual (non-caching) masters in the system. We
thus have a way of identifying if a request came from a cache or
not. The introduction of ReadSharedReq thus removes the need for the
current isTopLevel hack, and also allows us to stop relying on
checking the packet size to determine if the source is a cache or
not. This is fixed in follow-on patches.
|
|
This patch adds eviction notices to the caches, to provide accurate
tracking of cache blocks in snoop filters. We add the CleanEvict
message to the memory heirarchy and use both CleanEvicts and
Writebacks with BLOCK_CACHED flags to propagate notice of clean and
dirty evictions respectively, down the memory hierarchy. Note that the
BLOCK_CACHED flag indicates whether there exist any copies of the
evicted block in the caches above the evicting cache.
The purpose of the CleanEvict message is to notify snoop filters of
silent evictions in the relevant caches. The CleanEvict message
behaves much like a Writeback. CleanEvict is a write and a request but
unlike a Writeback, CleanEvict does not have data and does not need
exclusive access to the block. The cache generates the CleanEvict
message on a fill resulting in eviction of a clean block. Before
travelling downwards CleanEvict requests generate zero-time snoop
requests to check if the same block is cached in upper levels of the
memory heirarchy. If the block exists, the cache discards the
CleanEvict message. The snoops check the tags, writeback queue and the
MSHRs of upper level caches in a manner similar to snoops generated
from HardPFReqs. Currently CleanEvicts keep travelling towards main
memory unless they encounter the block corresponding to their address
or reach main memory (since we have no well defined point of
serialisation). Main memory simply discards CleanEvict messages.
We have modified the behavior of Writebacks, such that they generate
snoops to check for the presence of blocks in upper level caches. It
is possible in our current implmentation for a lower level cache to be
writing back a block while a shared copy of the same block exists in
the upper level cache. If the snoops find the same block in upper
level caches, we set the BLOCK_CACHED flag in the Writeback message.
We have also added logic to account for interaction of other message
types with CleanEvicts waiting in the writeback queue. A simple
example is of a response arriving at a cache removing any CleanEvicts
to the same address from the cache's writeback queue.
|
|
This patch changes the valid-bytes start/end to a proper byte
mask. With the changes in timing introduced in previous patches there
are more packets waiting in queues, and there are regressions using
the checker CPU failing due to non-contigous read data being found in
the various cache queues.
This patch also adds some more comments explaining what is going on,
and adds the fourth and missing case to Packet::checkFunctional.
|
|
This patch cleans up the use of hasData and checkFunctional in the
packet. The hasData function is unfortunately suggesting that it
checks if the packet has a valid data pointer, when it does in fact
only check if the specific packet type is specified to have a data
payload. The confusion led to a bug in checkFunctional. The latter
function is also tidied up to avoid name overloading.
|
|
This patch cleans up the packet memory allocation confusion. The data
is always allocated at the requesting side, when a packet is created
(or copied), and there is never a need for any device to allocate any
space if it is merely responding to a paket. This behaviour is in line
with how SystemC and TLM works as well, thus increasing
interoperability, and matching established conventions.
The redundant calls to Packet::allocate are removed, and the checks in
the function are tightened up to make sure data is only ever allocated
once. There are still some oddities in the packet copy constructor
where we copy the data pointer if it is static (without ownership),
and allocate new space if the data is dynamic (with ownership). The
latter is being worked on further in a follow-on patch.
|
|
This patch takes a first step in tightening up how we use the data
pointer in write packets. A const getter is added for the pointer
itself (getConstPtr), and a number of member functions are also made
const accordingly. In a range of places throughout the memory system
the new member is used.
The patch also removes the unused isReadWrite function.
|
|
This patch changes two dynamic_cast to safe_cast as we assume the
return value is not NULL (without checking).
|
|
Support full-block writes directly rather than requiring RMW:
* a cache line is allocated in the cache upon receipt of a
WriteInvalidateReq, not the WriteInvalidateResp.
* only top-level caches allocate the line; the others just pass
the request along and invalidate as necessary.
* to close a timing window between the *Req and the *Resp, a new
metadata bit tracks whether another cache has read a copy of
the new line before the writeback to memory.
|
|
If a set of LL/SC requests contend on the same cache block we
can get into a situation where CPUs will deadlock if they expect
a failed SC to supply them data. This case happens where 3 or
more cores are contending for a cache block using LL/SC and the system
is configured where 2 cores are connected to a local bus and the
third is connected to a remote bus. If a core on the local bus
sends an SCUpgrade and the core on the remote bus sends and SCUpgrade
they will race to see who will win the SC access. In the meantime
if the other core appends a read to one of the SCUpgrades it will expect
to be supplied data by that SCUpgrade transaction. If it happens that
the SCUpgrade that was picked to supply the data is failed, it will
drop the appended request for data and never respond, leaving the requesting
core to deadlock. This patch makes all SC's behave as normal stores to
prevent this case but still makes sure to check whether it can perform
the update.
|
|
This patch adds the basic building blocks required to support e.g. ARM
TrustZone by discerning secure and non-secure memory accesses.
|
|
This patch provides useful printouts throughut the memory system. This
includes pretty-printed cache tags and function call messages
(call-stack like).
|
|
This patch adds a predecessor field to the SenderState base class to
make the process of linking them up more uniform, and enable a
traversal of the stack without knowing the specific type of the
subclasses.
There are a number of simplifications done as part of changing the
SenderState, particularly in the RubyTest.
|
|
This patch removes the NACK frrom the packet as there is no longer any
module in the system that issues them (the bridge was the only one and
the previous patch removes that).
The handling of NACKs was mostly avoided throughout the code base, by
using e.g. panic or assert false, but in a few locations the NACKs
were actually dealt with (although NACKs never occured in any of the
regressions). Most notably, the DMA port will now never receive a NACK
and the backoff time is thus never changed. As a consequence, the
entire backoff mechanism (similar to a PCI bus) is now removed and the
DMA port entirely relies on the bus performing the arbitration and
issuing a retry when appropriate. This is more in line with e.g. PCIe.
Surprisingly, this patch has no impact on any of the regressions. As
mentioned in the patch that removes the NACK from the bridge, a
follow-up patch should change the request and response buffer size for
at least one regression to also verify that the system behaves as
expected when the bridge fills up.
|
|
This patch removes unused commands and attributes from the packet to
avoid any confusion. It is part of an effort to clear up how and where
different commands and attributes are used.
|
|
This command will be sent from the memory system (Ruby) to the LSQ of
an O3 CPU so that the LSQ, if it needs to, invalidates the address in
the request packet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This adds the derived class FunctionalPacket to fix a long standing
deficiency in the Packet class where it was unable to handle finding data to
partially satisfy a functional access. Made this a derived class as
functional accesses are used only in certain contexts and to not add any
additional overhead to the existing Packet class.
|
|
This patch rpovides functional access support in Ruby. Currently only
the M5Port of RubyPort supports functional accesses. The support for
functional through the PioPort will be added as a separate patch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corrects an oversight in cset f97b62be544f. The fix there only
failed queued SCUpgradeReq packets that encountered an
invalidation, which meant that the upgrade had to reach the L2
cache. To handle pending requests in the L1 we must similarly
fail StoreCondReq packets too.
|
|
We can't just obliviously return the first valid cache block
we find any more... see comments for details.
|
|
|
|
Requires new "SCUpgradeReq" message that marks upgrades
for store conditionals, so downstream caches can fail
these when they run into invalidations.
See http://www.m5sim.org/flyspray/task/197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
memory range.
|
|
|
|
where we defer a response to a read from a far-away cache A, then later
defer a ReadExcl from a cache B on the same bus as us. We'll assert
MemInhibit in both cases, but in the latter case MemInhibit will keep
the invalidation from reaching cache A. This special response tells
cache A that it gets the block to satisfy its read, but must immediately
invalidate it.
--HG--
extra : convert_revision : f85c8b47bb30232da37ac861b50a6539dc81161b
|
|
--HG--
extra : convert_revision : 73b753e57c355b7e6873f047ddc8cb371c3136b7
|
|
--HG--
extra : convert_revision : cc73b9aaf73e9dacf52f3350fa591e67ca4ccee6
|
|
--HG--
extra : convert_revision : f0a2947ccc49e0d18bc17a59371fa396d9ebd6c0
|
