| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Those classes are already ISA specific, so we can just move initCPU's
contents there and take it out of utility.hh, utility.cc, and the base
System's initState.
Change-Id: I28f0d0b50d83efe5116b0b24d20f8182a02823e7
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/24905
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
|
|
These two functions were called in exactly one place one right after
the other, and served similar purposes.
This change merges them together, and cleans them up slightly. It also
removes checks for FullSystem, since those functions are only called
in full system to begin with.
Change-Id: I214f7d2d3f88960dccb5895c1241f61cd78716a8
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/24904
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
|
|
The call to initCPU was moved into initState in the base CPU class
since it should only really be called when starting a simulation
fresh. Otherwise checkpointed state will be loaded over the state of
the CPU anyway, so there's no reason to set up anything else.
Unfortunately that made it possible for the System level initialization
and the CPU initialization to happen out of order, effectively letting
initCPU clobber the state the System might have set up to prepare for
executing a kernel for instance.
To work around that issue, the call was moved to init which would
necessarily happen before initState, restoring the original ordering.
This change moves the change *back* into initState, but of the System
class instead of the CPU class. This makes it possible to guarantee
that OS initialization happens after initCPU since that's also done
by System subclasses, and they control when they call initCPU of the
base class.
This also slightly simmplifies when initCPU is called since we
shouldn't need to check whether a context is switched out or not. If
it's registered with the System object, then it should be in a
currently swapped in CPU.
This also puts the initCPU and startupCPU calls right next to each
other. A future change will take advantage of that and merge the
calls together.
Also, because there are already ISA specific subclasses of System
which already have specialized versions of initState, we should be
able to move the code in initCPU and startupCPU directly into those
subclasses. That will give those subclasses more flexibilty if, for
instance, they want all CPUs to start running in the BIOS like they
would on a real system, or if they want only the BSP to be active
as if the BIOS had already paused the APs before passing control to
a bootloader or OS.
This will also remove another two TheISA:: style functions, reducing
the number of global dependencies on a single ISA.
Change-Id: Ic56924660a5b575a07844a198f69a0e7fa212b52
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/24903
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
|
|
Some ABIs (including 32 bit ARM, 64 bit x86) allocate their argument
registers differently depending on their return value. For instance,
if the value needs to be returned in memory because it's too big,
the caller could pass a pointer to where the result should be stored
when the function returns. This pointer acts like an invisible first
argument, offsetting where all the normal arguments actually live.
This change adds a mechanism to handle that case. The Result templates
can now declare an allocate() static method which is given a
ThreadContext *, and a reference to the Position object. It can perform
any adjustment it needs to before the normal argument extraction
starts.
Change-Id: Ibda9095f0e8c9882742d24f5effe309ccb514188
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/23747
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
|
|
This method searches through the ThreadContexts stored in the system,
and has no concrete connection to Process other than it happened to be
used by a Process in the clone system call.
By moving it, we can use its functionality in classes other than
Process.
Change-Id: Ic6899c335dc13841c6fe948ea3a4f8ad67e562bb
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/24285
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Reviewed-by: Brandon Potter <Brandon.Potter@amd.com>
Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
|
|
It looks like this function is supposed to allow you to set up a PC
based event which will trigger when the simulator executes a particular
kernel function. That event doesn't actually do anything, but you can
set a breakpoint there with gdb when debugging gem5 itself.
There are a couple of problems with this function. First, it assumes
that you want to set the breakpoint based on the first system in your
simulation. Frequently simulations have only one system, but there
isn't any rule that says they must, or any way to pick a different
system.
Second, this function assumes that you're in FS mode, that there is a
kernel, and that there is a kernel symbol table to look symbols up in.
On top of that, this function is a bit redundant since you can just use
gdb to debug the kernel inside a simulated system.
Change-Id: I8dadbd42fc7d4ccba2a035a2a72e6ede4b872f3c
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/24644
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
|
|
This dumps a signature for a simcall as if it was going to be invoked,
and can be used for debugging.
Change-Id: I6262b94ad4186bac8dc5a1469e9bb3b8ae9d34e1
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/23460
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
|
|
Jira Issue: https://gem5.atlassian.net/browse/GEM5-187
Change-Id: I76934d94b4c61570a4ca603388012c65280e2b7c
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/23197
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
|
|
This will let a function called with a GuestABI emulate the ...
mechanism available in C. To make that possible without the functions
knowing anything about the ABI and to follow C++'s (sensible)
templating and virtual function rules, you have to tell VarArgs what
types you might want to extract from it, unlike the pure ... varargs
style mechanism.
Also unlike ..., there is no mechanism in place to force the varargs
to appear last in the argument list. It will pick up the progress
through the arguments at the point it's reached, and will ignore any
later arguments. It would be possible to be more rigorous about this
by changing the callFrom templates, but the overhead in complexity
is probably not worth it.
Also, retrieving arguments through a VarArgs happens live, meaning at
the point that the argument is asked for. If the ThreadContext or
memory the argument lives in is modified before that point, the
retrieved value will reflect that modification and not what the
function was originally called with. Care should be taken so that this
doesn't cause corrupted arguments.
Finally, this mechansim (and the Guest ABI mechanism in general) is
complex and should have tests written for it. That should be possible
since ThreadContext is forward declared and so the test can say it
works however it wants or even ignore it completely. If that changes
in the future, we may need a mock ThreadContext implementation.
Jira Issue: https://gem5.atlassian.net/browse/GEM5-187
Change-Id: I37484b50a3e8c0d259d9590e32fecbb5f76670c1
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/23195
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Reviewed-by: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
|
|
This mechanism is shared between ARM and x86, even if x86 has a typical
address range it choses to use. By moving this to the base class, it's
now possible for anybody to find out where the m5 ops are, and no ISA
specific assumptions need to be made.
Because the x86 address is well known, it's set in the x86 System
subclass as the default.
Jira Issue: https://gem5.atlassian.net/browse/GEM5-187
Change-Id: Ifdb9f5cd1ce38b3c4dafa7566c50f245f14cf790
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/23180
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
|
|
This isn't used by anything any more. The func field is left in place
to ensure compatability, but there's no reason to decode a value
nobody is going to use.
Jira Issue: https://gem5.atlassian.net/browse/GEM5-187
Change-Id: I85fcd0e4a362551c29af6bff350d99af86050415
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/23179
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Right now, there are only two places which call the pseudoInst function
directly, the ARM KVM CPU and the generic mmapped IPR. These two
callers currently use the generic "PseudoInstABI" which is just a
wrapper around the existing getArgument function.
In the future, this getArgument function will be disolved, and the
PseudoInstABI will be defined for each ABI. Since it currently mimics
the Linux ABI since gem5 can only handle one ABI at a time right now,
this implementation will probably be shared by linux system calls,
except that the pseudo inst implementation will eat return values since
those are returned through other means when the pseudo inst is based on
magic address ranges.
Jira Issue: https://gem5.atlassian.net/browse/GEM5-187
Change-Id: Ied97e4a968795158873e492289a1058c8e4e411b
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/23178
Reviewed-by: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
|
|
To preventing from instantiating an abstract class, hiding its
constructor is enough. Moving destructor to public doesn't break this
intention. This also makes us can use smart pointer to manage derived
Port class.
Change-Id: Ic9cf97e90a6c26108d359eb459df48cd23eaf15c
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/23925
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
|
|
This patch provides a new "System" parameter named "kernel_extras_addrs".
This allows to optionally specify fixed load addresses for the
additional kernel objects. This is useful to load arbitrary blobs into
memory.
Change-Id: I4725763b86c29f72282d1c184d4284d90f9d3016
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/23566
Reviewed-by: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
|
|
Everything that includes syscall_debug_macros.hh and uses the macro in
it will need these headers, so they should be included through
syscall_debug_macros.hh. The consumer shouldn't have to know what the
macros use internally and to include extra headers to support them.
Change-Id: I9bfa932368daec0772d552357ecad8790b4cfead
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/23459
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
|
|
kernelExtras facilitates a way for users to provide additional
blobs to load into memory. As of now, the creation of the extra
images is done independently of the kernel being provided, but
the loading is only done if the kernel is present.
This patch refactors the loading of extra images to be committed
if no kernel is present.
Change-Id: I900542e1034ade8d757d01823cfd4a30f0b36734
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/22850
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
|
|
The x86 version doesn't do anything x86 specific, and so can be used
generically in sim/pseudo_inst.(hh|cc)
Jira Issue: https://gem5.atlassian.net/browse/GEM5-187
Change-Id: I46c2a7d326bd7a95daa8611888051c180e92e446
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/23177
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
The logic that determines which syscall to call was built into the
implementation of faults/exceptions or even into the instruction
decoder, but that logic can depend on what OS is being used, and
sometimes even what version, for example 32bit vs. 64bit.
This change pushes that logic up into the Process objects since those
already handle a lot of the aspects of emulating the guest OS. Instead,
the ISA or fault implementations just notify the rest of the system
that a nebulous syscall has happened, and that gets propogated upward
until the process does something with it. That's very analogous to how
a system call would work on a real machine.
When a system call happens, the low level component which detects that
should call tc->syscall(&fault), where tc is the relevant thread (or
execution) context, and fault is a Fault which can ultimately be set
by the system call implementation.
The TC implementor (probably a CPU) will then have a chance to do
whatever it needs to to handle a system call. Currently only O3 does
anything special here. That implementor will end up calling the
Process's syscall() method.
Once in Process::syscall, the process object will use it's contextual
knowledge to determine what system call is being requested. It then
calls Process::doSyscall with the right syscall number, where doSyscall
centralizes the common mechanism for actually retrieving and calling
into the system call implementation.
Jira Issue: https://gem5.atlassian.net/browse/GEM5-187
Change-Id: I937ec1ef0576142c2a182ff33ca508d77ad0e7a1
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/23176
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brandon Potter <Brandon.Potter@amd.com>
|
|
Setting syscall args isn't really something we need to do in gem5,
since that will be taken care of by the code actually calling the
syscall. We just need to be able to retrieve the value it put there.
Jira Issue: https://gem5.atlassian.net/browse/GEM5-187
Change-Id: I0bb6d5d0207a7892414a722b3788cb70ee509582
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/23174
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
This will let system call implementations take arguments naturally,
and centrally defined, potentially complex, and ISA/context specific
mechanisms will automatically gather the arguments and store any
result.
Jira Issue: https://gem5.atlassian.net/browse/GEM5-187
Change-Id: I68d265e0bab5de372ba975e4c7e9bb2d968c80af
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/23172
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
The guest ABI is specified as a template parameter. This makes it
possible for host simcall handlers to be called through different ABIs
which might be from different ISAs, or might be from different contexts
within the same ISA (32 vs 64 bit, syscall vs. function vs.
pseudo instrunction vs. semihosting call).
Jira Issue: https://gem5.atlassian.net/browse/GEM5-187
Change-Id: I66a0f558e9c1f70a142b69b0dd95bd71e41d898b
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/23171
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Jira Issue: https://gem5.atlassian.net/browse/GEM5-187
Change-Id: Icee18a4bd77a346d7f82ef4988651b753392d51e
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/23170
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Instead of just using warn_once, we'll gate each warning on a bool
which is associated with the syscall desc pointer. To avoid having to
keep warn once bookkeeping in every syscall desc, we put it in a map
which is looked up at runtime.
Jira Issue: https://gem5.atlassian.net/browse/GEM5-187
Change-Id: I1dcce48de91b8a635f9f3df3bfc0ed6ba1291c4f
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/23168
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Reviewed-by: Brandon Potter <Brandon.Potter@amd.com>
|
|
This, among other things, prevents them from needing to toggle global
flags in the syscall desc table to control local behavior.
Jira Issue: https://gem5.atlassian.net/browse/GEM5-187
Change-Id: Idcef23766084f10d5205721b54a6768a850f7eb9
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/23167
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brandon Potter <Brandon.Potter@amd.com>
|
|
It makes more sense to specify whether something should be returned
based on the return, not intrinsically on the syscall. This is
especially true in cases like execve where the expected behavior
is not constant.
Jira Issue: https://gem5.atlassian.net/browse/GEM5-187
Change-Id: I95b53b6d69445c7a04c0049fbb0f439238d971e8
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/23166
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
|
|
Jira Issue: https://gem5.atlassian.net/browse/GEM5-187
Change-Id: I485004843393c2e10c1ff4dbd84fc30ca4fd490c
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/23165
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
|
|
This will enable using other types of callable like a lambda.
Jira Issue: https://gem5.atlassian.net/browse/GEM5-187
Change-Id: If9f7176205492830824b5fe3c00f2c7710f57f70
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/23164
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
|
|
This patch is aligning the readlink and access syscalls to the open one,
which is not overloading the openFunc, but it is factoring the
implementation into a openImpl, which is used by both open and openat.
This is needed if passing them to std::function, whose constructor is
not able to handle overloaded functions.
Change-Id: I50a8aacdfd675181b6fe9a2696220ee29cc5bc4b
Signed-off-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/23260
Reviewed-by: Brandon Potter <Brandon.Potter@amd.com>
Maintainer: Brandon Potter <Brandon.Potter@amd.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
|
|
Every syscall file access should go through the redirection process
Change-Id: I1ba2063b5a254e11f47392bdad0bf0887ba73d3d
Signed-off-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/23063
Reviewed-by: Brandon Potter <Brandon.Potter@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Maintainer: Brandon Potter <Brandon.Potter@amd.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
|
|
Sample output of FmtFlag,ExecAll,Event:
0: Event: Event_70: generic event rescheduled @ 18446744073709551615
0: ExecEnable: system.cpu: A0 T0 : @asm_main_after_prologue
0: Event: AtomicSimpleCPU tick.wrapped_function_event
500: ExecEnable: system.cpu: A0 T0 : @asm_main_after_prologue+4
500: Event: AtomicSimpleCPU tick.wrapped_function_event
1000: ExecEnable: system.cpu: A0 T0 : @asm_main_after_prologue+8
1000: Event: AtomicSimpleCPU tick.wrapped_function_event
1500: ExecEnable: system.cpu: A0 T0 : @asm_main_after_prologue+12
1500: Event: AtomicSimpleCPU tick.wrapped_function_event
Change-Id: I7f252b57d7778a15a3dda40d909bdb4425557a40
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/22009
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
|
|
At Ia6b4d3e6148c64721d810b8f1fffaa208a394b06 the futex wake up started
skipping selecting threads that are already awake, which already prevented
some deadlocks.
However, threads that are Halting or Halted should not be woken up either,
as those represent cores in which processes have already exited.
Before this commit, this could lead an exited core to wake up, which would
then immediately re-execute the exit syscall, and possibly leave one
genuinely sleeping core locked and:
Exiting @ tick 18446744073709551615 because simulate() limit reached
Change-Id: I1531b56d605d47252dc0620bb3e755b7cf84df97
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/22963
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Reviewed-by: Brandon Potter <Brandon.Potter@amd.com>
Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
|
|
Unit tests are currently broken.
commit d40f0bc579fb8b10da7181d3a144cd3e9a0a0e59 is removing the
BigEndianOrder and LittleEndianOrder namespace.
Therefore we shouldn't test them and their helpers.
Change-Id: I68a45f264b782334d0a0f725c2c435c27337e757
Signed-off-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/22943
Reviewed-by: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
|
|
These tests assume the "end address" is not included in the range. This
exposed some bugs in addr_range.hh which have been fixed. Where
appropriate code comments in addr_range.hh have been extended to improve
understanding of the class's behavior.
Hard-coded AddrRange values in the project have been updated to take
into account that end address is now exclusive. The python params.py
interface has been updated to conform to this new standard.
Change-Id: Idd1e75d5771d198c4b8142b28de0f3a6e9007a52
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/22427
Maintainer: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Reviewed-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
|
|
These namespaces were used to set up an environment/context where there
was an implicit guest namespace. This is an issue when there may be
multiple guest endiannesses which might be different. In cases where
we don't know what the guest endianness is, we can't rely on it being
an implicit part of our context since that would be ambiguous. In cases
where we do know, for instance in ISA specific code, we can just use
the endianness specific version that's appropriate for that context.
This also (somewhat) removes the assumption that there is a single
endianness that applies for a particular ISA. Practically speaking this
assumption will probably still stand though, since there would likely
be a non-trivial performance penalty to apply a configurable endianness
instead of a fixed one the compiler can optomize/remove.
Change-Id: I2dff338b58726d724f387388efe32d9233885680
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/22374
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
|
|
In addition to the test, "#include base/logging.hh" was added to the
"byteswap.hh". It is is required to compile the header.
Added tests ByteswapTest.swap_byte64, ByteswapTest.swap_byte32,
ByteswapTest.swap_byte16, ByteswapTest.swap_byte, ByteswapTest.htog,
and ByteswapTest.gtoh. The file byteswap.hh is mostly templates.
Added test for BigEndianGuest and LittleEndianGuest namespaces.
Change-Id: I8870a55594ed439fe9e1fb333384f73261d1b1b8
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/22080
Reviewed-by: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Maintainer: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I5cf4291b19dd2d2bdbbf145ad8e00994fabf5547
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/22366
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Brandon Potter <Brandon.Potter@amd.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
|
|
This converts the syscall implementations to either use the
OS::byteOrder constant or, if that's not available, the system's
getGuestByteOrder() accessor, to determine the byte order, instead of
relying on TheISA to provide the correct accessor.
Change-Id: Idf7b02ee8d73990224ceac9a5efaec91a5ebf79f
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/22364
Reviewed-by: Brandon Potter <Brandon.Potter@amd.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
|
|
This goes along with the existing getPageBytes, etc., accessors, and
paves the way for this to be a parameter of the System class.
Change-Id: Ibfe2d591185d23beccdd5bbff1092dc07b1278ac
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/22272
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Maintainer: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
|
|
The System keeps track of what events are live so new ThreadContexts
can have the same set of events as the other ThreadContexts.
Change-Id: Id22bfa0af7592a43d97be1564ca067b08ac1de7c
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/22106
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
|
|
These can now be built without referring to anything in ThreadContext
and so can be built even with the NULL ISA. This means the pcEventQueue
can be unconditionally built into the System class. Even though the
pcEventQueue is going away, this still makes it possible for System to
be a PCEventScope unconditionally.
Change-Id: Ia342bb7972b1b5ce95033176d72af4bfa343560f
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/22104
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Maintainer: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
|
|
This abstracts away the raw PCEventQueue managed by the System.
Change-Id: I04d773e6be90a891884a76841f15c3eecd5796ed
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/22101
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
|
|
FutexMap::wakeup is called when the futex(TGT_FUTEX_WAKE syscall is done.
FutexMap maintains a list of sleeping threads for each futex address
added on FutexMap::suspend, and entries are removed from the list
at FutexMap::wakeup.
The problem is that this system was not taking into account that threads
can be woken up by memory accesses to locked addresses via the path:
SimpleThread::activate
BaseSimpleCPU::wakeup
AbstractMemory::checkLockedAddrList
AbstractMemory::access
DRAMCtrl::recvAtomic
CoherentXBar::recvAtomicBackdoor
SimpleExecContext::writeMem
which happens on trivial pthread examples on ARM at least. The instruction
that locked memory in those test cases was LDAXR.
This could lead futex(TGT_FUTEX_WAKE to awake a thread that is already
awake but is first on the sleeping thread list, instead of a sleeping one,
which can lead all threads to incorrectly sleep and in turn to
"simulate() limit reached".
To implement this, ThreadContext::activate return now returns a boolean
that indicates if the state changed. suspend and halt are also modified
to also return a boolean in the same case for symmetry, although this is
not strictly necessary for the current patch.
Change-Id: Ia6b4d3e6148c64721d810b8f1fffaa208a394b06
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/21606
Reviewed-by: Brandon Potter <Brandon.Potter@amd.com>
Maintainer: Brandon Potter <Brandon.Potter@amd.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I3e2bd1dd34d7cc00b2685547ab74b56bd8126128
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/21605
Reviewed-by: Brandon Potter <Brandon.Potter@amd.com>
Maintainer: Brandon Potter <Brandon.Potter@amd.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
|
|
This code was originally in the ObjectFile class, but not all object
files will become Processes. All Processes will ultimately come from
ObjectFiles though, so it makes more sense to put that class there.
Change-Id: Ie73e4cdecbb51ce53d24cf68911a6cfc0685d771
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/21468
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
This queue was set up to allow triggering events based on the total
number of instructions executed at the system level, and was added in
a change which added a number of things to support McPAT. No code
checked into gem5 actually schedules an event on that queue, and no
code in McPAT (which seems to have gone dormant) either downloadable
from github or found in ext modify gem5 in a way that makes it use
the instEventQueue.
Also, the KVM CPU does not interact with the instEventQueue correctly.
While it does check the per-thread instruction event queue when
deciding how long to run, it does not check the instEventQueue. It will
poke it to run events when it stops for other reasons, but it may (and
likely will) have run beyond the point where it was supposed to stop.
Since this queue doesn't seem to actually be used for anything, isn't
being used properly in all cases anyway, and adds overhead to all the
CPU models, this change eliminates it.
Change-Id: I0e126df14788c37a6d58ca9e1bb2686b70e60d88
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/21783
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Reviewed-by: Tiago Mück <tiago.muck@arm.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
|
|
A memory image can be described by an object file, but an object file
is more than a memory image. Also, it makes sense to manipulate a
memory image to, for instance, change how it's loaded into memory. That
takes on larger implications (relocations, the entry point, symbols,
etc.) when talking about the whole object file, and also modifies
aspects which may not need to change. For instance if an image needs
to be loaded into memory at addresses different from what's in the
object file, but other things like symbols need to stay unmodified.
Change-Id: Ia360405ffb2c1c48e0cc201ac0a0764357996a54
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/21466
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brandon Potter <Brandon.Potter@amd.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
The ObjectFile class has hardcoded assumptions that there are three
segments, text, bss and data. There are some files which have one
"segment" like raw files, where the entire file's contents are
considered a single segment. There are also ELF files which can have
an arbitrary number of segments, and those segments can hold any
number of sections, including the text, data and/or bss sections.
Removing this assumption frees up some object file formats from having
to twist themselves to fit in that structure, possibly introducing
ambiguities when some segments may fulfill multiple roles.
Change-Id: I976e06a3a90ef852b17a6485e2595b006b2090d5
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/21463
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
ELF is, in my opinion, the most important object file format gem5
currently understands, and in ELF terminolgy the blob of data that
needs to be loaded into memory to a particular location is called a
segment. A section is a software level view of what's in a region
of memory, and a single segment may contain multiple sections which
happen to follow each other in memory.
Change-Id: Ib810c5050723d5a96bd7550515b08ac695fb1b02
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/21462
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
The params pointer is kept by the SimObject and should not be deleted
until gem5 exits. Added a to do to remember this object is leaked.
Change-Id: I46cc23a09e4e9b6bc2fdcd961148324c41820815
Signed-off-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/18068
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Maintainer: Brandon Potter <Brandon.Potter@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Brandon Potter <Brandon.Potter@amd.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Ic0ce1b098cfe0ce6ea37986a8a55002a5c18a66c
Signed-off-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/21304
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
|
