Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
These overloads of sc_trace take the unsigned version of some primitive
types. The compiler thought it was ambiguous how to convert an unsigned
integer value into a signed one since there were several different
functions which took signed integer parameters of various sizes.
These versions of sc_trace aren't in the standard, but they are in the
Accellera implementation and do fix building of the regression tests.
Change-Id: I26fd06d90ae6bf5fc5aed24bc2ac826ad69eee31
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/11182
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
The spec defines these constants to be macros, but the regression test
refers to them using the sc_core namespace. That breaks things because
the macros don't expand to an identifier, they expand to an expression.
This change converts the macros into enums like in the Accellera
implementation to get the regression tests to build.
Change-Id: I3db7dc87a7a597907df658624a7343bc6ca1734e
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/11180
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
The iterator class needs to have some operators, etc., defined so that
tests written against it can compile correctly. The implementations
were heavily influenced by the Accellera implementation.
Also it should be noted that the systemc spec is incorrect where it
defines these classes. When implemented like they are in the
Accellera version, the versions of bind in sc_vector_assembly which
take sc_vector<T>::iterator and iterator parameters are different, and
so they can overload each other. If implemented as described by the
spec however, those types are the same and the code won't compile.
Change-Id: I62852adf7e6c0a2f3df076ba4e93d2501859c32d
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/11177
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I9e9724edb6281e0b0a6bae5546b0ede77d295c12
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/10841
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|