| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
We can now be sure register_id will work even mid static initializers,
so we don't have to use python initialization as a hook to install
these predefined message ids.
Change-Id: I2e4d0c678ddda0a9ce5b114bdf1710f36e955f23
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13976
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
|
|
By declaring the map as a static variable in that function and then
returning it, we can guarantee that it's initialized relative to other
static initializers so that we don't try to use a data structure that
isn't constructed yet. This will let us get rid of the dependence on
python for setting up that mapping.
Change-Id: I031ce2039de8f5f79fbb9d76cf1363f15207b64b
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13975
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
|
|
STL containers may need to be constructed before they're used. Don't
count on being able to insert into them during a static initializer.
Change-Id: Icb05d5084a470e1ebd976ae6e1954b1a78aabd6a
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13329
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
These ids are the ones the Accellera implementation/tests use. Some of
the tests expect them to be available and usable.
Change-Id: I4e4dc3470c28d4113330a44ccd06ffe7724e75b1
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13322
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
This is actually not consistent with how it was handled in 2.0.1 which
is supposedly what this is supposed to be backwards compatible with,
in that in the earlier version on info and warning messages were
suppressed. This is exposed by one of the tests,
utils/sc_report/test01, which suppresses an integer ID and then reports
an error with it. The "golden" output shows the message supressed, but
the actual implementation makes no such distinction.
This implementation duplicates Accelleras for now, but a future change
will make it consistent with the old implementation so the test will
pass.
Change-Id: I8f959321151e2bb60b94000594f30531b80e2684
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13319
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
There's a deprecated reporting mechanism based on integer message ids,
and the reporting mechanism needs to be refactored a bit to make it
easier to support.
Some bookkeeping data structures were moved out to somewhere they
can be accessed by other code, obviating the non-standard get_handler
function.
Change-Id: Id427cd79be9ef0f3275fbac39ff047ab672fb3e0
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13318
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
