Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
This patch is implementing GICD_IGROUPR register.
Change-Id: I1626f61fbf7deec9c81d8d2c135f1d6c0c4eb891
Signed-off-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12946
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Maintainer: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
|
|
Read/WriteCpu methods in the GICv2 are accessing the GICC_CTRL register
as if writing any non-zero value to the register will enable IRQ
signaling to the CPU. Instead, only the 2 least significant bits
control group0/group1 enablement. This patch is renaming GICC_CTRL
underlying data buffer from cpuEnabled to cpuControl and it is making it
an array of uint32_t instead of bool. cpuEnabled now becomes a method
and checks if GICC_CTRL.EnableGrp0 or GICC_CTRL.EnableGrp0 are set.
Change-Id: I40f0b3c52c40abd482a856f032bf3686f96ef641
Signed-off-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12945
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Maintainer: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
|
|
For level sensitive interrupt IRQ line must be cleared when interrupt is
deasserted. This is not the case for edge-trigerred interrupt.
Change-Id: Ib1660da74a296750c0eb9e20878d4ee64bd23130
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12944
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Maintainer: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
|
|
This patch is making it possible to use SERIALIZE_ARRAY and UNSERIALIZE
array for serializing arrays of BitUnions.
Change-Id: I682766b472585f70a89338f373fb94dff5db53c3
Signed-off-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12924
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I8c4eb9389b47df8cdf1eec966bb2c9da85a7a7c8
Signed-off-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12744
Maintainer: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
|
|
When checking for PPIs to send to the cpu in the PL390 GIC we
were forwarding any pending PPI regardless of their masking
in the distributor.
Change-Id: I2e294abeca733cca95cd0deeb9659c7d3d9d8734
Signed-off-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12624
Maintainer: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
|
|
Writing a 1 to the Overflow Flag Status register should trigger an
interrupt raise/clear depending on the register we are currently using
(PMOVSCLR for clearing and PMOVSSET for raising).
Change-Id: I2091456685a245712045cf7a4932ac36b7dded1d
Signed-off-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12531
Maintainer: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I19475b86d04af5b3e4e907d9e24cb15666fb7bb1
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12274
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
The various phases assume there are at least some tests, and if there
are none they may try to run malformed commands.
Change-Id: I041d35c504da57b830c490651ab1b3c98e0288ca
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12273
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I4c902cd81f7e46f81f601cae0ff2da044ef48f85
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12272
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
The tests expect to be run from a certain directory. Generally that
doesn't matter, but in at least one case the test opens a file with a
relative path, and that doesn't work unless CWD is what it expects.
Change-Id: I34c0ed975e77daed50ace4f7eebd034bf04c5595
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12271
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Use rpath to link the gem5 dynamic library into the systemc test
binaries so that they don't have to be run from a particular directory
to resolve all their linking dependencies.
Change-Id: I66b18c23ae6bbf32a959022f8789fc8bdd3a6c6b
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12270
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
When in sc_main, sc_is_running will return true but we're not going
to run any gem5 events since we're currently in the sc_main Fiber. In
that case, we need to do the sc_stop work inline.
If we're actually running and not just paused, then we do still want to
schedule the work of sc_stop to happen as its own event since that will
happen before returning to sc_main, and actually will likely be the
mechanism by which sc_main starts executing again.
Change-Id: If9ffafc4f240af0f3d9c726b36a0950b5219dc00
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12269
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Make sure we check for starvation after timed notifications and at the
very end of delta cycles (after delta notifications, not before). Also
reverse the order of starvation checks (whether they apply at all, then
if they're satisfied) to make those checks faster. Checking a bool
is a lot easier than checking if a bunch of other structures are
empty.
Change-Id: I514ff219909823f1f424fde69856d6b510655188
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12268
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
The ready event is what notices that we only wanted to run one delta
cycle, or no delta cycle if there was nothing to do, and return to
sc_main. If the ready event wasn't scheduled, we would advance time
before the ready event ran and returned to sc_main which is incorrect.
Change-Id: Ic3c10a2f1405f744e8c2bd37aa45846ee6e98e12
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12267
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
If sc_stop is called during one of the various callbacks, that has
defined behavior and will cause the simulation to stop after the
current batch of callbacks. We were checking whether sc_stop had been
called during one of those batches and killing the system, erroneously
assuming that meant it had called during elaboration.
This change moves the check to before the callbacks which actually
does mean that sc_stop was called during elaboration.
Change-Id: I6876305450e52a407acffb9a2f45ee2ae24a9adf
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12266
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Methods may need to yield control to other Processes when throwing
them exceptions. In that case, we need to keep track of the fact that
the method doesn't need to be restarted when it resumes within yield.
Change-Id: I829c387d6ddb563b2957db47e55adadbbe6bc51a
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12265
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Don't just fall off the end of the fiber and return to gem5. By
calling yield, we ensure that remaining Processes are run and that
bookkeeping is maintained correctly.
Change-Id: Ifbe104e155cad29e40a89767a7c1f986399f784d
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12264
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Ifbcd7e4148b82b9bf5241e040e812925daea3705
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12263
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
The sc_port code had been using the .at() function of the vector class,
but when that failed it threw an exception, and it was very difficult
to tell where the exception came from from how gem5 crashed. This
change switches to sc_assert (the systemc version of assert) which
makes the cause/location of failures much more obvious.
Change-Id: I1cd51c86f47b314be551c304b014c44cfa030175
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12262
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Id615856af7ea366e499747e00f66924a25623663
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12261
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
This takes advantage of the utility functions that exist a little
better, and also avoids accidentally asymetrically using
eventsToSchedule and eq->(de)schedule.
Change-Id: I1eb1c228d47684cccb9deaf6f3409b77cfbad4cd
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12260
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
This change puts sc_process_b into the inheritance hierarchy for the
Process types. It also adds the nonstandard sc_set_location function
and calls it from the nonstandard WAIT* macros.
Change-Id: Ic997dcf74d262774dd7b53504146e372e03af2e0
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12259
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
If the simulation isn't running, these should be replaced with versions
generated by sc_gen_unique_name().
Change-Id: Idd515e73ba17d3dfa866ee5509369e9c4e3fb2f5
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12258
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
A null pointer for an sc_object name is supposed to be equivalent to
an empty string.
Change-Id: I6094577ad43f13d47a20bc67fa15f4c04d448fe5
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12257
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
A regression tests checks this situation.
Change-Id: I7716bf7c8cf219c372ab9722fc0ad52e7e674b17
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12256
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
The time resolution won't yet be fixed, so the scaling factor will
still be set to zero.
Change-Id: I1d1e58316ee05cc477a31ce90e2bbf56dcbc65c3
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12255
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Accellera's implementation prints any sc_report which is thrown and
escapes sc_main, so we need to do the same to make some tests pass.
Arguably gem5 should fail if sc_main reports an error, but verify.py
would interpret that as the test failing too, and some tests
purposefully generate errors.
This change also stops using the logging module. It wasn't really
providing any benefit, and added extra decoration to log messages
which confused verify.py.
Change-Id: I6850d0ada5e477b67527d99d421478586cda93b3
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12254
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
That makes it possible for the config script to retrieve the result of
running sc_main. sc_main (or at least the python front end for it)
can't return results directly since it usually doesn't run to
completion when it's first called.
Change-Id: I9740e9688571e2ca824a684be70480f1eadddcdb
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12253
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
It was checking the first character of the message for a null byte, but
not whether the message string pointer itself was null.
Change-Id: Iddef1e22c35b55c8c898670576ab416dd1023d7c
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12252
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
This is tested by the regression tests. Also make sure the handshake
which sets up instances of sc_module is cleaned up if we bail partway
through for some reason, for instance if an intermediate class throws
an exception as part of its constructor.
Change-Id: I89afe5f76832cc132aa2bb8f19916dea64546784
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12251
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
If we're descheduling an event which is at the current time, it may
have been scheduled as a delta notification, but it could have also
been scheduled as a timed notification and we just got to that point
in time. If an event is for the current time but isn't in the delta
notifications, this change detects that and then treats it as a timed
notification.
Change-Id: I1d8f4c40325cc7f355b7f2e6f08611483ce11858
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12250
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
When sc_main returns, clear out any pending work in the scheduler and
also block the systemc kernel from doing actions which correspond with
the start of simulation.
It's most likely that work like oustanding timeouts might survive past
the end of sc_main, especially if it never officially called sc_stop.
It's also possible for sc_main to return and never actually call
sc_start. In that case, the kernel should not call callbacks of the
various objects (which may no longer even exist), or go through the
initialization phase.
If sc_main is never called at all, then the kernel's actions aren't
gated.
Change-Id: I49bf094be3283a92d846d2f3da224950bd893a5c
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12249
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
It's be useful/necessary to flush pending activity even when not
tearing down the scheduler, specifically when stopping.
Change-Id: I6b3716a8ca1f8ca151222e08f30bd3c9a43364b9
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12248
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
The notifyWork function for SensitivityEventAndList assumes it's
being triggered by an event which is part of its list, but when
SensitivityTimeoutAndEventAndList triggers it might be from an event
or from a timeout. This change overrides notifyWork for that class and
makes it delegate to notifyWork for the subclasses depending on whether
there's an event pointer.
Change-Id: I598af2b78d71ee9934edea10ca7ac5c88149e3f3
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12247
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
If the readyEvent is still scheduled when sc_main completes, gem5 will
return to it's main fiber and keep executing events, including that
one. That means a delta cycle will run even after sc_main is complete.
This change ensures that the readyEvent has been descheduled as part
of stopping.
Change-Id: I9479ac4ebff3335477b371b02efa6d44c70cbc8e
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12224
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
If an event has a delayed notification pending, that should be cleared
if it's later notified immediately.
Change-Id: I4272f6b47a41d80756769f3fe69069a00016dbd6
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12223
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Make the scheduler clear itself out when it's destructed to ensure that
nobody will try to use it after it's gone away. Also make sure there
are no pending events which might refer to it as well, either systemc
events or gem5 events.
Change-Id: I12dadc06bd9db7016a8dc0c1827b3e630b0d23d5
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12222
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Because sc_inout needs sc_dt::sc_logic and that probably calls
functions from dt_sc_mempool.cc and because those hadn't yet been
stubbed out. This change adds stubs for those as well.
Change-Id: I544a1669575b594d4612558b8b6f47668ac94414
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12221
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
The spec says these are essentially identical classes, they just have
both so that users can show their intent.
Change-Id: I51908edca89acea25891a52bfa7fca0681ccfc5c
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12220
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
These events are either scheduled directly, or if no event queue is
yet available they're recorded in a map to schedule later. Since this
was used in a few places (and should have been used for the ready
event), this change moves it into some common functions which remove
some duplication and abstract away this detail.
Change-Id: I4320d7296f4f72344539b2b4b2564a6a27576dd8
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12219
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Even if the simulation would return from sc_start immediately because
of starvation, this change ensures that sc_start gives control back
to gem5 so that the scheduler will have a chance to set up
sensitivities, etc., before things get torn down.
Change-Id: I39b1fd704fcbe12c299cad9dbd30258e8fe9d032
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12218
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
The initialization phase had been done in a somewhat adhoc way,
partially because delta notifications were being handled as top level
gem5 events which were ordered based on their priorities. This change
makes the initialization phase happen more explicitly, and more in the
order in the spec.
Change-Id: I91d56b63fefcb81c845c52c97826a976a7559fad
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12217
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
This makes them end up in simout so verify.py can find them when it's
checking output.
Change-Id: I2b7b276b3e1816a257f58b0cfb13487d6296e6fd
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12216
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Ic195f46ac13b46a02c86a5fc8d90ba66a415a9c8
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12215
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Now that delta events are handled explicitly by the scheduler, there's
no reason to run the readyEvent inline when returning from a pause. The
delta events will necessarily be run after the evaluate and update
phases.
Change-Id: Iad6d431a87742354e3a46a0fb44c309aa785ea60
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12214
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Rather than delegating them entirely to the gem5 event queue and using
priorities to ensure the right thing happens, this change adds a few
new structures which keep track of them and give the scheduler more
control over what happens and in what order. The old scheme was mostly
correct, but there were some competing situations which made it next
to impossible to make everything happen at the right time.
Change-Id: I43f4dd6ddfa488a31073c0318bb41369b1a6117d
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12213
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
In the previous implementation, messages are randomly inserted with
delays only if both RubySystem and MessageBuffer randomization flags
are set true. However, to find race conditions and cover more slicc
transitions, ruby random testers rely on setting RubySystem flag to
turn on randomization on all message buffers.
As a fix, this patch enables a message buffer to have randomization
when either RubySystem or its own flag is set.
Change-Id: I1e076908ff07e5846ebad4f4fc1c8f28d40bbfd4
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12784
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
|
|
This is a special case which is mentioned in the spec but hadn't yet
been given any special handling in this implementation.
Change-Id: I500d046f09d916a08e22821f8d3e2f490f8ba5bb
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12212
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I170d67fef61dd5536a842a1f64682d90ae7a1507
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12211
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
|