1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
|
/*****************************************************************************
Licensed to Accellera Systems Initiative Inc. (Accellera) under one or
more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed
with this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
Accellera licenses this file to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0
(the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with the
License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
implied. See the License for the specific language governing
permissions and limitations under the License.
*****************************************************************************/
/*****************************************************************************
test.cpp --
Original Author: Martin Janssen, Synopsys, Inc., 2002-02-15
*****************************************************************************/
/*****************************************************************************
MODIFICATION LOG - modifiers, enter your name, affiliation, date and
changes you are making here.
Name, Affiliation, Date:
Description of Modification:
*****************************************************************************/
/*
Hello,
sorry for asking again about the sc_start/sc_cycle problem but...
The following program causes trouble (SystemC V2.0b2):
*/
#include "systemc.h"
SC_MODULE(createpulse)
{
public:
sc_in_clk i_clk;
private:
int trigger1,trigger2;
void pulse()
{
while(true)
{
wait();
cout << sc_time_stamp() << ": trigger1 : " <<trigger1++ << endl;
wait(1,SC_NS);
cout << sc_time_stamp() << ": trigger2 : " <<trigger2++ << endl;
}
}
public:
SC_CTOR(createpulse)
{
SC_THREAD(pulse);
sensitive << i_clk.pos();
trigger1 = 0;
trigger2 = 0;
}
};
// createpulse dut("testpulse");
int sc_main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int i;
sc_trace_file *tf;
sc_signal<bool> clk1;
sc_set_time_resolution(1,SC_NS);
sc_set_default_time_unit(1,SC_NS);
// sc_clock dummy( "dummy", 2, SC_NS );
createpulse dut("testpulse");
dut.i_clk(clk1); // see other posting
tf=sc_create_vcd_trace_file("vcdtrace");
sc_trace(tf,clk1,"clock");
// sc_initialize(); // comment out for sc_start version
for(i=0;i<10;i++)
{
clk1=0;
// sc_cycle(5,SC_NS); // change to sc_start
sc_start( 5, SC_NS );
clk1=1;
// sc_cycle(5,SC_NS); // change to sc_start
sc_start( 5, SC_NS );
}
cout << "finishing at " << sc_time_stamp() << endl;
sc_close_vcd_trace_file(tf);
return(EXIT_SUCCESS);
}
/*
With this programm, the clk1 is generated as can be seen in the trace file.
But the pulse procedure gets stuck in the second wait function. With SystemC
V1.x, this worked with replacing sc_cycle with sc_start (and removing the
sc_initialize), however calling sc_start multiple was an undocumented feature
and it doesnt work in V2.0b2 (no clk is generated).
I know that this problem can be solved by creating an own clock generation
module using wait()s and just a single sc_start in sc_main, but IMHO
sometimes it is desirable to do it the way shown above. So is this possible
with SystemC V2.0 ?
Regards, Sven Heithecker
--
Sven Heithecker IDA, Hans-Sommer-Str. 66
Technical University of Braunschweig 38106 Braunschweig
Tel. +49-(0)531-391-3751(voice)/4587(fax) Germany
http://www.ida.ing.tu-bs.de/~svenh heithecker@ida.ing.tu-bs.de
*/
|
