summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/cpu/o3/lsq_unit_impl.hh
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGiacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>2018-06-04 09:40:19 +0100
committerGiacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>2018-06-11 16:55:30 +0000
commitf54020eb8155371725ab75b0fc5c419287eca084 (patch)
tree65d379f7603e689e083e9a58ff4c2e90abd19fbf /src/cpu/o3/lsq_unit_impl.hh
parent2113b21996d086dab32b9fd388efe3df241bfbd2 (diff)
downloadgem5-f54020eb8155371725ab75b0fc5c419287eca084.tar.xz
misc: Using smart pointers for memory Requests
This patch is changing the underlying type for RequestPtr from Request* to shared_ptr<Request>. Having memory requests being managed by smart pointers will simplify the code; it will also prevent memory leakage and dangling pointers. Change-Id: I7749af38a11ac8eb4d53d8df1252951e0890fde3 Signed-off-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com> Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/10996 Reviewed-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com> Maintainer: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'src/cpu/o3/lsq_unit_impl.hh')
-rw-r--r--src/cpu/o3/lsq_unit_impl.hh22
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/src/cpu/o3/lsq_unit_impl.hh b/src/cpu/o3/lsq_unit_impl.hh
index e8e2c1853..c2750be7d 100644
--- a/src/cpu/o3/lsq_unit_impl.hh
+++ b/src/cpu/o3/lsq_unit_impl.hh
@@ -79,7 +79,6 @@ LSQUnit<Impl>::WritebackEvent::process()
if (pkt->senderState)
delete pkt->senderState;
- delete pkt->req;
delete pkt;
}
@@ -133,7 +132,6 @@ LSQUnit<Impl>::completeDataAccess(PacketPtr pkt)
}
if (TheISA::HasUnalignedMemAcc && state->isSplit && state->isLoad) {
- delete state->mainPkt->req;
delete state->mainPkt;
}
@@ -831,9 +829,9 @@ LSQUnit<Impl>::writebackStores()
DynInstPtr inst = storeQueue[storeWBIdx].inst;
- RequestPtr req = storeQueue[storeWBIdx].req;
- RequestPtr sreqLow = storeQueue[storeWBIdx].sreqLow;
- RequestPtr sreqHigh = storeQueue[storeWBIdx].sreqHigh;
+ RequestPtr &req = storeQueue[storeWBIdx].req;
+ const RequestPtr &sreqLow = storeQueue[storeWBIdx].sreqLow;
+ const RequestPtr &sreqHigh = storeQueue[storeWBIdx].sreqHigh;
storeQueue[storeWBIdx].committed = true;
@@ -874,7 +872,6 @@ LSQUnit<Impl>::writebackStores()
state->outstanding = 2;
// Can delete the main request now.
- delete req;
req = sreqLow;
}
@@ -923,11 +920,8 @@ LSQUnit<Impl>::writebackStores()
assert(snd_data_pkt->req->isMmappedIpr());
TheISA::handleIprWrite(thread, snd_data_pkt);
delete snd_data_pkt;
- delete sreqLow;
- delete sreqHigh;
}
delete state;
- delete req;
completeStore(storeWBIdx);
incrStIdx(storeWBIdx);
} else if (!sendStore(data_pkt)) {
@@ -1061,16 +1055,12 @@ LSQUnit<Impl>::squash(const InstSeqNum &squashed_num)
// Must delete request now that it wasn't handed off to
// memory. This is quite ugly. @todo: Figure out the proper
// place to really handle request deletes.
- delete storeQueue[store_idx].req;
+ storeQueue[store_idx].req.reset();
if (TheISA::HasUnalignedMemAcc && storeQueue[store_idx].isSplit) {
- delete storeQueue[store_idx].sreqLow;
- delete storeQueue[store_idx].sreqHigh;
-
- storeQueue[store_idx].sreqLow = NULL;
- storeQueue[store_idx].sreqHigh = NULL;
+ storeQueue[store_idx].sreqLow.reset();
+ storeQueue[store_idx].sreqHigh.reset();
}
- storeQueue[store_idx].req = NULL;
--stores;
// Inefficient!